Talk:Anti-tank warfare

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces (general topics):
	Military technology and engineering task force
	Weaponry task force

This article is in serious need of reformatting. AllStarZ 04:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Serious need of editing more like. 82.70.225.97 08:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merge from tank#Vulnerability

The article Tank is far too large. Most of the tank#Vulnerability section should be merged here, leaving behind a concise summary. Any objections? —Michael Z. 2006-10-18 16:52 Z

I think that's appropriate - most of the information really belongs here anyway. Carom 17:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

--Jinxs 22:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rewrite needed

this article has no refs and sound likes a non-formal lecturer please rewrite into a clearer, more formal format.

i recently deleted a sentence reading "The only thing that saved the south koreans and the americans from a total rout was a well organized retreat."

basically, the thing is, now matter how you put it, a retreat is a retreat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zarzhu (talk • contribs) 00:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)