Talk:Anti-submarine boom net (Sydney Harbour WWII)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	Australian military history task force

Portal	Anti-submarine boom net (Sydney Harbour WWII) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

A fact from Anti-submarine boom net (Sydney Harbour WWII) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 22 November 2007.

[edit] Nice article

And interesting photos. Congrats!

Thanks, if it wasn't for the trip out to Watsons Bay and the info on the plaque, this article would not have been possible for me. The info seems to be a little hard to come by on the net. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I would still like to add as much as poss, more info about the winch house and maybe a black and white photo of it would do it some justice as well. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Possible"

The last image caption reads "A possible entrance to a World War II bunker or tunnel system located on Green Point near the winch house foundations" is "possible" hinting at original research? The image page seems to say there is no doubt that it is the enterance. Which is right? And are there 3rd parties that agree that is either is, or possibly is the enterance? It's a little confusing, but good, interesting article. SGGH ^speak! 17:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Plus why does it show in one picture that the defensive measure is called an "Anti-torpedo net" when the article is called an "Anti-submarine boom net"? --293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

It was used for both purposes but I thought that anti sub boom was more approp for article name. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 01:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Naming issues

There were hundreds of these, in every port or harbour or river estuary of any note anywhere in the world that either the Allied or Axis navies operated. This article is named as if it is about anti-sub boom nets in general, but is only about the Sydney one. These were defences of note, they deserve an article to themselves, and I think the name of this article should be changed to have the word "Sydney" in it somewhere.

Nice article though!

--Chrisfow (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. Anti-submarine boom nets are a worthwhile topic for an article, and many of the individual nets will be notable. I'd suggest that this article be moved to either Sydney anti-submarine boom net or Anti-submarine boom net (Sydney). --Nick Dowling (talk) 23:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

The name that I gave this in the first place was Anti-submarine boom net (Sydney Harbour WWII), someone changed it to anti boom net or something or rather, I have now changed it back. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 01:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Looks good. --Nick Dowling (talk) 04:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)