Talk:Anthony McAuliffe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject District of Columbia      (Rated Start-Class) This article is supported by the District of Columbia WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to District of Columbia-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) WikiProject Biography     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] WikiProject West Virginia University Anthony McAuliffe is within the scope of WikiProject West Virginia University, dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of West Virginia University. For more info see the project page. Military history WikiProject     (Rated Stub-Class) This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): World War II task force

One of McAuliffe's subordinates (quite possibly Ross Whitehead, I did not write down the name) mentioned in a recent Belgian documentary that McAuliffe's initial reaction was "oh, nuts" because he was genuinely under the impression that the Germans wanted to surrender. Then they contemplated what would be the official response to the Germans and the subordinate suggested that McAuliffe's initial reply would be a good one. While delivering the response to the Germans they did use the F word when they said they would shoot at any Germans attempting to enter the city of Bastoigne.

I've removed the account by Ross Whitehead. The only web references to it are Wikipedia clones. There are several that back up the version that I've replaced it with. DJ Clayworth 14:37, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

In a letter to the editor of The New York Times published in the July 19, 1987 edition, Charles B. MacDonald, the author of "A Time for Trumpets: The Untold Story of the Battle of the Bulge" took exception to an essay on war written by William Manchester and published in the June 14, 1987 edition. In that essay, Mr Manchester wrote that General McAuliffe did not say "Nuts" in response to the German demand for surrender. Mr. MacDonald stated that he heard it from General McAuliffe himself and from his operations officer, Harry Kinnard, who was present, that McAuliffe did indeed say "Nuts!".

Mr. MacDonald included a comment about his 1949 interview with General McAuliffe in his book. You can find it in the end notes for Chapter XXIV.

Ken McAuliffe -- Bastogne 15:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Lt. Col. Kinnard is the man who decided what to say in the formal speech Gen. McAuliffe gave to the soldiers at Bastogne. This speech (as seen on HBO's Band of Brothers) might be confused by some with Col. Harper's official reply to the Germans. Kinnard was one of those around Gen. McAuliffe who encouraged the use of "Nuts!"

At a loss for an official reply, those around him said that his first remark summed the situation up well. The official reply: 'To the German Commander, "Nuts!"' was typed and delivered by Colonel Harper to the German delegation.

OK, I have seen all this discussion about what was said, many times. What I want to know is what was written down and the evidence for it. In 1947 and 1948 there was the "Freedom Train" tour. My recollection is that among other things, the train contained the document. But, I can find no mention of that,or the document. Everything else is in wiki, why not this?

Henry H.

Henry H. 17:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 11/13/05

Reply to Henry H.:

The document that was in the Freedon Train was a copy of General McAuliffe's message to the troops on Christmas 1944. It included the text of both the German surrender demand and the succinct reply of General McAuliffe. It was composed by Lt. Col. Kinnard on Christmas Eve while General McAuliffe was attending a Catholic Mass being held in Savy, where one on his artillery units was based. When he returned to the HQ, General McAuliffe agreed with what Col. Kinnard had written and it was run off and distributed to the troops. It is mentioned in the series "Band of Brothers", episode 6. A copy of that message is occasionally sold on eBay. I have added a link to a scan of my copy of the message.

http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t181/bastogne_kjm/1944Xmas_msg.jpg

Ken McAuliffe -- Bastogne 15:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question

The article states that he attained the rank of General on 1955.

Was he a General during world war 2?

The article keeps referring to him as General even during world war 2, so things are a bit confusing. 64.229.20.213 05:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

--- Response ---

General McAuliffe became a Brigadier General (one star) in 1942. He was promoted to Major General (two stars) in 1945. He was promoted to Lieutenant General (three stars) in 1951. His promotion to General (four stars) occured in 1955.

Ken McAuliffe

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] rising through the ranks...

"He rose through the ranks from Second Lieutenant in 1918 to General in 1955." Usually used to apply to other ranks, as officers would always be commissioned as 2nd lts or equivalent, and hopefully promoted. Midgley (talk) 10:33, 12 June 2008 (UTC)