Talk:Anthony Cordesman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hu, he does write a lot, I have to agree. The article however lucks vital details like birth place, family background, year of birth. This would make the article more of a bio than a list of books
---
Please note that the criticism section does not reflect a neutral point of view, or, at least, magnifies "criticisms" of Cordesman. The cited criticism is not of Cordesman's "work" (as corpus), it is of only one book by him. The citation method also pretends to be linking to multiple critics when it is in fact linking to the same critic. It is also not clear that the website in question conforms to Wikipedia's standards (can someone verify this?) simply because it contains a review of Cordesman's publication. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.17.165 (talk) 07:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)