User talk:Anonymous anonymous/Talk Section Archives Page 5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Message from Buzlink (talk · contribs)
Thanks Thanks for the welcome msg, sorry for the delay in responding. (Hope I put this in the correct section) --buzlink 20:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] not too sure
not too sure if i'm doing this right cos i have no idea how to use it, just created an account having seen an article which is some kind of joke and was wondering how to get it changed or deleted- Number9111 14:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Hi Anonymous anonymous/Talk Section Archives Page 5, thank you for voting in my RFA which failed eventually at a result of (91/51/8). I do not plan to run for adminship until a later date. Once again, I would like to thank you for voting. --Terence Ong (talk | contribs) 14:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 2006 Philippines coup
Thank you for The Minor Barnstar that you awarded for me for recognizing my work. I'm sorry I'm unable to reply you back or to engage with your activities because I'm busy with my studies, but rest assured that I will do my very best to reply to your messages promply. Anyway, a thank you for the recognition! --Darth Narutorious 09:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hello
Thank you for the tag and help. I still don't know if I am doing this right but I'm working on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elthearosa (talk • contribs)
[edit] Thank you
Thank you so much for your kind words on my talk page :) Whopper 04:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
I just wanted to say thanks for the barnstar. --Pilot|guy 14:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
I still have cold, but I'm getting better. Also, thanks for the kind comment. :) --☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 16:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yay!
When I register, I'm bringing it with me to my new userpage. I hope you don't mind. :) -- * 69.145.123.171 Hello! 17:14, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Recognition.
Hello, I can recognize you because you always edit the WikiDefcon. So, Do you usually edit the WikiDefcon? I'm just curious. *~Daniel~* 03:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the welcome
I've edited a few pages before, and I think it's time to get an account. DJ Rubbie 11:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mtz206
Hi, you seem to be both supporting & being neutral in this RFA. Could you please clarify your stand & strike out the other vote? Thanks --Srikeit (Talk | Email) 15:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] VandalProof reverts
I was curious, how did you get the section titles in the warnings you give users on VandalProof? I tried to do it in CustomButtons.txt but it doesn't seem to work for me. —Mets501 (talk) 13:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Cool! Thanks for letting me know. I think I'll try that too. However, does VandalProof recognize those warnings in the bar up top that says how many warnings a user has received? —Mets501 (talk) 13:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you for the welcome
Hi Anonymous anonymous, thank you very much for the welcome. I'm trying to learn my way around the wiki editing system so that my contributions will be better (and many thanks also to Deborahjay for the improvements on my two articles so far!). I'm hoping to get a lot more active. Do you know by any chance how I can get all my wikiboxes (the "I'm a member of..") to all line up under each other on the right hand side of the page out of the way of the text on my userpage? Yaeli 09:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Yaeli
[edit] Wikibreak
Have fun in LA. Hope you have a nice time. We'll still be here when you come back! Regards, Iolakana|(talk) 13:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
I hope your family is well, and that Los Angeles is pleasant. I myself have an almost assuredly disastrous family wedding the 24th, so I sincerely hope you have a good time. RyanGerbil10 (Drop on in!) 07:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks!
 |
Thanks for voting! Hello Anonymous anonymous/Talk Section Archives Page 5, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care. |
Also thanks for the award! --Pilot|guy 22:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hee hee
Well, I sorta registered. Click my siginature! Yay! 69.145.123.171 Hello! Wednesday, June 21, 2006, 21:17 (UTC)
[edit] User:Anonymous anonymous testing
I noticed that section of your user page that says you have a "testing" account. What exactly do you mean by testing?--The Ninth Bright Shiner talk 01:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My (Mtz206) RfA
 |
Thanks for supporting me in my RFA. My Request was successful with 41 supports, 12 opposes and 5 neutrals, and I'll do my best to live up to your expectations. If in any point in the future you get the feeling I'm doing something wrong, do not hesitate to drop me a line. -- mtz206 (talk) 02:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] User:Anonymous anonymous/RFA Criteria
I noticed your !vote on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Joshbuddy, and took a look at your criteria from that. I saw you have 4500 edits total. I think that is rather on the high side. In an extreme example it is possible for someone to have written hundreds of articles, several of them featured, posted many thoughtful and helpful comments on various talk pages showing a deep understanding of how Wikipedia works, being civil, having the right attitude etc, and still have less than 4500 edits. Of course it is also possible that someone has done many 'quick and minor' edits to reach that total, without showing an understanding of policy etc. I guess I'm just trying to ask you to assess a candidate based on their actual experience rather than simple a number.
Also there are quite a lot of re-directs surrounding that page (especially from the talk page), it would probably be worth fixing them (the double ones at least). Petros471 17:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- I wasn't really commenting on your decision in that case, more of a general point. I guess the same goes (to lesser extent) for your other numbers, please do look at the quality as well as the quantity (and if you do that you might find yourself making a fair number of exceptions). This is only a suggestion though, I respect editors have very different RFA criteria from each other, and that's fine (well as long as it's not based on something totally stupid like sex, race or something like that). Petros471 17:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Ok great, as I said I was trying to make more of a general point than trying to get you to change your !vote for Josh (I could have said I saw you post on Cyde's talk page, and my comments would have been the same :) As you mention it though, I should point out that all the blocks by Curps were made by Curps' bot making a mistake and/or testing (after all he was unblocked straight away after them, and if you look through his talk page history you can't see any vandalism warnings, and the moves that triggered one were tests), so you really shouldn't hold that particular point against him. Petros471 17:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi there!
Are you Filipino? (Reply at the Talk Section of | My Talk Page Anonymous anonymous 22:35, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, why? Are you? Hehe... Anyway, since we are talking about Filipinos, have you heard about Filipino Biscuits? [1] --Kapuso 15:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Winhunter
May I ask which RFA Criteria I failed? If it is WP edits <350 then please feel free to check my updated stat. --WinHunter (talk) 18:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RFA Criteria
Is your "minimum edits in Wikipedia Namespace" number really 4500? On Petros471's talk page[2] you seem to state that 350 minimum edits is your number. 4500 sounds very high and 350 sounds very low. Are either/both of these typos? What number did you intend to state? (I realize that your list of criteria is a work and progress and was only posted today...) Thanks! --AStanhope 19:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome back
Welcome back from your Wikibreak. — Nathan (talk) 22:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] VP or popups
I currently am using popups more often than VP. However, I think you can do the whole process of rolling back and warning quicker in VP. Although I feel that I can dig into deeper cases of vandalism, and roll back across multiple vandals in a row, with different IPs, and therefore am more effective. --Porqin 12:08, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tawkerbots
At the present there is
- Tawkerbot2
- Tawkerbot4
- AntiVanalBot
- Xenophon (bot)
- Werdnabot2
Which are all in the TB2 network. They're not all active at any given time, though recently we've been running with at least 3 up -- Tawker 16:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Test wiki
Sorry for the late reply. You should now be a sysop and a 'crat. Have fun :) . And thanks for the barnstar, BTW! --GeorgeMoney T·C 17:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your vote on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bruno Senna
Hi Anonymous anonymous,
Sorry to bother you, but I've updated the captions on the edits to make it perfectly clear which version you support. Please update your vote and state which version you support. Please use the naming located under the main caption in bold, large text. Thanks, --Fir0002 09:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Response from Holywarrior
Plz go thru Trials I faced on my user page.Besides CVU tag even if they want to retain should at least have it written on them.Does not guarantee they are not vandals.It is a sort of bullying tag too and has been highly misused.Holywarrior 13:32, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cleanup Template
My bot, User:Alphachimpbot has just modified some of your cleanup templates. I just figured I would tell you... {{Cleanup|MONTH YEAR}} is not a valid template. Use {{Cleanup-date|MONTH YEAR}} instead. Just figured that I would tell you. --Alphachimp talk 16:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yea...
OLD news ;D, alot of other people have said stuff, but I love to see the layers... 68.39.174.238 17:55, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Oh ho!
I dare say you have a spiffy username! And for that, I give you soap!
 |
You now totally have soap. This soap is slippery, and thus good. |
The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake (Prophesize|Witchcraft) 14:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thanks for the anti-vandalism on my page.
The Ronin 19:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Revert RE: Military history of Aus
You reverted someones edit about an attack on Sydney harbour by Japanese midget subs, I looked it up and it appears to be true. I could be wrong? [3]
relates to page: [4]
Cheers Fyver528 10:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, just noticed it as something I'd never heard of before in regards to WWII, so I checked it out. I was using VandalProof at the time and know how hard it is to tell if something is fact/urban myth or plan vandalism. Keep it up mate Fyver528 10:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thanks for helping me to relax, Anonymous anonymous! I really appreciate it. :) -- Natalya 11:42, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
Thank you very much for my barnstar, it is deeply appreciated. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 14:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ;)
[5] ;) G.He 01:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nice
I have seen you around and I feel nice meeting you. --Bhadani 17:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks
Thanks so much for the support on my recent RfA, which I'm quite happy to announce has passed with a consensus of 67 supporting, 0 opposed and 0 neutral. I'm glad I passed your criteria, and I'll be working hard to justify the vote of confidence you've placed in me. Let me know at my talk page any time if I can help you with any admin-related tasks, or just if you have any comments on how I'm doing as an admin. Thanks! TheProject 21:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for your support in my RfA!
 |
Thanks for voting! Hello Anonymous anonymous/Talk Section Archives Page 5, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] RFA thanks
[edit] RfA Thank you
| Thank you!
Thank you, Anon. Y. Mous, for your support in my RfA. I am happy to be able to say that it has acheived a consenus of wikipedians, and that I will be assuming my new responsibilities immediately. I appreciate your trust and support, especially in that you took the time to investigate my record, as opposed to making a snap decision, and I will do my best to further help this great encyclopædia and community of ours. If there is anything that you feel I can do to help, please let me know. -- Avi 01:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
