User talk:Ankaram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] What did I Wrong?

this page page contains no copyrighted material. I edited the material and post it. You may control the page mentioned. I added anti-semitism links to Armenia and NK pages because anti-semitism is a vital subject for any country. I could make more contributions in different subjects in future to these pages, however I wanted to add these usefull links to all relevant Armenia pages and I could not understand why they were deleted. I have different opinion but I did add very little opinion. I just add couple of links from various sources, including British NGO IWPR.

  • Under American law, which is what applies on Wikipedia, all content is copyrighted, whether or not it contains such a notice, unless it is specifically released for all use or the public domain.
  • As for adding the links, please add only links specifically relevant to the topic. Adding the same 3 links to multiple pages is obviously not doing that. Each link may be relevant to a particular article we have here, but they weren't all related to all the articles you added them to. If you have a specific article about anti-Semitism in Nagorno-Karabakh, add it, perhaps to the anti-Semitism article, and maaaybe to Nagorno-Karabakh, but then don't add it to other pages as well. --Golbez 21:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Ankaram, and welcome to Wikipedia! The page Anti-Semitism in Armenia has been deleted, because it appears to be a direct copy and paste from this page, which includes an assertion of copyright. Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome.

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Vary | Talk 19:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A few things

  1. Please stop adding links to vaguely or not-at-all relevant sites. A discussion on Jews and Armenia is not needed for Nagorno-Karabakh, and particularly not the same 3 or 4 links you put in other pages.
  2. Please discuss things in talk pages before making provocative or controversial edits, like adding "totallydisputed".
  3. Please do not paste things from other websites into articles.

Thank you. --Golbez 20:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A few more things

Hello Akaram. Welcome to Wikipedia.

  1. Yes, please stop adding links to not relevant sites. I noticed you entered lots of news-paper related links to the site Zaman (newspaper). I reverted to the version with only links relevant to that paper.
  2. Please have a look at WP:NPOV. I also had to revert some of your edits on the article Roj TV - we cannot claim that they are a bunch of terrorists, nomatter what you think. Controversies between the TV station and the Turkish government must be mentioned, but in a neutral way.

Thanks. Bertilvidet 21:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi Sedat Laciner, Welcome to Wikipedia

I hope you injoy your stay. Few things though that you should consider. It is not adviced for you to creat an article about yourself, while this has been said to you when posted on your other accounts talk page I think it was necessary for me to repeat what another member already told you when he moved your curiculum. You have added unrelated links in Wikipedia articles pointing to your articles on the web, while you may consider yourself notable enough, you should on the other hand consider that there are standards of notability in Wikipedia.

Also, I have seen you have also edited while unregistered the Armenian Genocide on March 10s period, adding materials you yourself wrote and also added links in the anti-semitism article pointing to your articles and recently under this new login of yours you added texts you wrote again. While the Armenian Genocide article is right now locked for new users and anonymous users before you decide editing when permitted access you must take the time to read Wikipedia policies about neutrality. In here, you won't find Armenian journalists such as Maral Ohanessian to make fun of. Regards. Fad (ix) 18:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi Laciner, I am a little saddened to realise that you stopped contributing to Wikipedia after my Welcome message, I was wondering why so? Another thing, Maral is wondering when will her last message be published, she apparently emailed it to your email addresses, the three of them but as of yet has not recieved any answers. I hope that this delay has nothing to do with your shortness of word in your preparation to answer her in the follow up. The reason why this crossed my mind is because your answer to the letter number 5 was far from satisfying.
Also, you may in due time, when you have time of course, take the moment to read the exchanges I and Holdwater had in Wikipedia. I guess Holdwater tried having better audience recycling his failure in Wikipedia in your journal. I was also informed that I was in the wrong in my belief that Maral was a journalist, I could not have expected that you will fail to get your message accross against someone not only who doesn't have the PhD to hide herself under like some, but not even the least, in journalism.
Lastly, I have decided to publish her last letter on the web, of course after getting her premission with the rest of the other letters including yours and the one written by Holdwater, while she refused to answer him, I will write an answer to Holdwater letter. Of course, if the last letter was unpublished because of some technical difficulties just tell me and I may reconsider my decision.
Truly yours. Fad (ix) 03:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Battle of Gallipoli

Hi Ankaram,

I completely agree with you that both sides' perspectives should be in the article, it actually goes in according to our neutral point of view policy here at Wikipedia. However, the numbers shouldn't be from soures from either side of the conflict. Britannica is a neutral source for example. Cheers, Khoikhoi 17:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Links on Michael Jackson page.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. The links you added to the page Michael Jackson have been removed. Please do not add commercial links—or links to your own private websites—to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. Note that Wikipedia may see print or DVD publication, so we want more content, not more web links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Funky Monkey  (talk)  02:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Notability of Christopher Brewin

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Christopher Brewin, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Christopher Brewin seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Christopher Brewin, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Christopher Brewin

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Christopher Brewin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Christopher Brewin. Pastordavid (talk) 19:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Christopher Brewin

I have nominated Christopher Brewin, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Brewin. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Redfarmer (talk) 22:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)