From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents 1 Reply on how to set up the Time Zone 2 I Agree with Nishkid64 3 Vandalism reports 4 Script linking to User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js 5 Misstep :-) 6 Adoptee 7 To the Owner of this Talkpage 8 Clock code 9 Your Answer... 10 Damage Inc 11 RE: User logo 12 Your User Page 13 Argument 14 Reply on how to set up the Time Zone 15 SNOW MADNESS 16 Monobook 17 User Page 18 Two Comments 19 Edit Counter 20 Signature 21 Article Size 22 A New Barstar 23 Two New Messages 24 Hey 25 Umm.... 26 And ummm... 27 Thanks 28 A Medley of Responses 29 A Medley of Responses to Responses to Responses :D 30 A medley of math test reponses 31 RE: Your block of 207.144.220.3 32 A Medley of Responses (this is getting kind of cliche) :D 33 Please sign my autograph page 34 Autograph Book 35 AJMS 36 Barnstar 37 SNOW MADNESS 38 Monobook 39 User Page 40 Two Comments 41 Edit Counter 42 Signature 43 Article Size 44 A New Barstar 45 Two New Messages 46 Hey 47 Umm.... 48 And ummm... 49 Thanks 50 A Medley of Responses 51 A Medley of Responses to Responses to Responses :D 52 A medley of math test reponses 53 RE: Your block of 207.144.220.3 54 A Medley of Responses (this is getting kind of cliche) :D 55 Please sign my autograph page 56 Autograph Book 57 Barnstar 58 Cool!! 59 Monobook Issues 60 More Issues 61 User name... 62 Sorry! 63 Yay! 64 On the Matter of the Prank Page 64.1 Signature 64.2 Re: Ads 64.3 RfA 64.4 reply... 64.5 Your user page 64.6 Monobook 64.7 A new bot... 64.8 My RfA 64.9 Field Trip 64.10 Editor review 64.11 AJMS 64.12 Pattern of reverting? 64.13 RE: Your predicted outcome of my hypothetical RfA 64.14 Editor review 64.15 Smile 64.16 Bot? 64.17 Lobelia 64.18 You're back! 64.19 Reply 64.20 Barnstar for you! 64.21 Smile! 64.22 Hahah 64.23 Thanks, very much! 64.24 Templates 64.25 March 2007 64.26 unconstructive edit? 64.27 Your question 64.28 Vandal block 64.29 Talk Page Formatting 64.30 Reply 64.31 Sorry! 64.32 Response to Irony 64.33 Magic Words 64.34 Re: Question on MOTD 64.35 Thanks 64.36 I'M DONE WITH IT!! 64.37 hey 64.38 Barnstar of Good Humor 64.39 My IQ 64.40 Adoption 64.41 AWB Approval 64.42 Signature 64.43 My ErR thanks 64.44 RE: RFA Message 64.45 vandalproof moderation 64.46 Gave My Review 64.47 New Menu!! 64.48 User:Qxz 64.49 Mainspace Edits 64.50 Monobook 64.51 Signature 64.52 Spoiler tags 64.53 help! 64.54 Hello? 64.55 Page Protection 64.56 He didn't 64.57 Adoption 64.58 Confused in Confusionland 64.59 My Comments 64.60 Your userpage 64.61 Reply 64.62 Re: Hidden Text 64.63 Reply 64.64 :) 64.65 Hello 64.66 Review 64.67 ...! 64.68 IP

Reply on how to set up the Time Zone

Okay. How do you do it then?

I Agree with Nishkid64

You have made more edits in one month than I have made in 6 !!!! Now for the substance of this message, you have enough edits in the Wikipedia namespace that you should be familiar with the policies of this wiki. What I am getting at is do you want me to nominate you for adminship in about 1 month. Please tell me how you feel about this on my talk page, it's the "trip" part of my signature :D ~Steptrip 14:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Very flattering. Your question strikes me as a bit odd, though (or does this sort of thing happen often?) While I may feel differently a month from now, that's a month away, and I have no idea whether I'll feel differently then or even still be contributing. I don't particularly want to be an administrator at the moment; also, I think there is more to being an administrator than just making edits in the Wikipedia namespace – don't rely on statistics to judge someone! (See also my comments on User talk:Chrislk02). You're welcome to ask again a month from now, but I think you're likely to get the same answer. Thanks anyway – Qxz 14:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

What I meant by the # of Edits in the wikipedia namespace is that it will show people who think that you have not been here long enough that you are more familiar with policy than they are. As for the oddness of my question, I don't understand why you think my nomination is odd when other people are trying to nominate you for RfA. (I'm not fully awake yet, don't take this as sarcasm.) ~Steptrip 14:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I understand that. However, the vast majority of my edits to the Wikipedia namespace have been to WP:AIV or one of the many requested-article pages. Little knowledge of policy is required to remove blue links from a page, and not much more is needed to add a vandal's name with a template. It would be different if I had made the same number of edits but to policy page – this is why statistics are misleading. I think the other suggestions of nominations I've been getting are equally odd, especially since a cursory glance at Requests for Adminship tells me that many people will oppose anyone with less than 6 months' experience, regardless of their knowledge of policy or activity in that time – Qxz 14:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I think Qxz is wise in pointing out that #ofedits is not the end all and be all. Too many Wikipedians judge others by their number count which is absolutely silly. Certainly after 1,000 edits any user is usually reliable, productive, and wise to the ways of Wikipedia. Keep in mind though, that one edit creating an excellent article for the first time is worth over 500 minor edits. And I've seen many Wikipedians vainly blow up their edit count by purposely making countless minor edits when one Save page would do the job, or focus more on their user page than on Wikipedia itself. It's pretty sad when that happens. With that being said, Qxz is performing an excellent service for Wikipedia. ~ Rollo44 06:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism reports

Thanks for watching out for vandals, please try to give people at least the three standard warnings before reporting them on the Admin intervention page. If they haven't vandalised past a final warning, we can't block them! TimVickers 22:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

It's not a hard-and-fast rule, if they are particularly obscene and disruptive then use the "Only warning you will receive" template and they will be blocked after that. TimVickers 01:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Script linking to User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js

I've fixed the script; there was a typo that had got in somehow (and the link target was wrong, I think). You might want to try copying the code from this revision of my JS sandbox, which should be a corrected version. Hope that helps! --ais523 09:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Misstep :-)

Hello Steptrip and thank you for your vandalfight. I think that you should see this. This user got warned three times for a single vandalism edit. I believe that this happened because the 3 RC patrollers involved sent automatic warnings as they tried to revert the edit at the same time. But your test4 warning seems rather abrupt anyway... Regards, Húsönd 01:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Adoptee

Hello, Mr. Steptrip. I know a user seeking an adopter for several days. Would you mind adopting him? HIs name is Chiefsfan364. Thanks, bye. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for deciding to adopt me... Now What? ----User:Chiefsfan364 00:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

To the Owner of this Talkpage

Have you checked out my userpage? If you have any advice, could you lend me a hand?

---

User:Chiefsfan364 |User_talk:Chiefsfan364 01:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Clock code

<div style="width:90px; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;border:1px solid #ccc; background: #fff; border-right:3px solid #ccc; border-bottom:3px solid #ccc; text-align: center; padding:3px; font-size: smaller; line-height: 1.3; margin-right: 4px;">
<div style="width:100%; background:#aabbaa">My local time:</div>
<div style="width:100%">{{#time:l|# hours}}</div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; width: 100%;"><span class="plainlinks" id="purgelink">[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=purge}} <font color="black">{{#time:j|# hours}}</font>]</span></div>
<div style="width: 100%;">{{#time:F Y|# hours}}</div>
<div style="background: #aaa; color: #000;">'''{{#time:g:i a|# hours}}''' EST</div>
</div>

Just replace the #'s with your local UTC offset (found in your preferences). UTC time looks like the following.

My clock uses 12 hour time, which uses the lowercase g, as well as an am/pm switch, the lowercase a (this can be changed to AM/PM with a capital A). Any other changes, check m:ParserFunctions##time:—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and the date is a purge link :D.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I believe that this is the template you are looking for:

Your Answer...

I'm sorry, that's not the answer. The trick is to look beyond what you see. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

It's not white, and I can't give more hints. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't quite understand what you mean by captital "S". If you think that "S" is the answer, it's not right. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I had to make this month's harder, because my first one was solved five minutes after I posted it. Thanks for trying! :) --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Can you please sign my autograph book? I think your signature is very cool! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Damage Inc

why did you revert that misspelling to the wrong way again? And warn the guy. You might want to take a second look and delete his warning, please. --Xiahou 02:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll take it off for you. He is just helping by fixing the spelling right. Thanks for your time. --Xiahou 02:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: User logo

Do you mean the one I use in my menu bar? I did that myself in Photoshop :)...or do you mean something else?¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 18:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

It wasn't much. I just opened up Photoshop, chose a font I liked, added a beveled and drop shadow effect from the text effects options, and uploaded it :P. Nothing really fancy. Try googling around for some Photoshop tutorials and see what you find.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

I have the Creative Suite edition which comes with way more refinements with what you can do with text. However, Elements or the Startup edition does have some options to work around with text (I've forgotten most of them however because I haven't used the basic editions in a long time). You can always turn the text into a picture and play around with it that way. Here are some tutorials I found on ask.com which might help if you want to do it that way: http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/photoshoptutorialstextfx/Creating_Text_Effects_with_Photoshop.htm ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Your User Page

I like your new user page layout! It's much more organized, and visually pleasing. Where did you find this? Or did you make it yourself? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I see. Good job with that. Sorry if I stop talking all of the sudden. A blizzard is blowing outside, and we've lost power four times already. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm located in the middle of it all (eastern Iowa). I have no problem with it because I only had two days of school this week. Plus, I LOVE snow. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Are you in school too? I'm in 8th. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Cool! May I add you to my friends list? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Got it. You can look at it here. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I like your bouncing "Wikiball". --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

That'll look pretty sweet! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 20:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Right now I'm updating my user page. In a couple hours, the most I've managed to do is get rid of the white border lines. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 20:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I might do some more formatting, but right now I'm focusing on creating new greeting templates. You can look at them at User:Cremepuff222/Greeting. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 20:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Nice one. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 20:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello! I needed help with something and I didn't know who else to turn to. It's an article issue, so let me know! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 23:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Never mind. It was on the hacky sack article. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:04, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I was trying to do some reference work, but I decided that it wasn't worth it. It's okay, I don't need help. You can look at this heated discussion though. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry! I put the wrong link. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

If you want to have some more background info, go here, here, here,and here. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I have a problem with your second to the last userbox. I'm pretty sure that the "their" should be "his or her" since the subject is singular. (I probably like English as much as you do! :) ) --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Argument

Aye. That argument is not worth fighting over anymore. I've already dragged more people than neccessary (including my teacher, Xiner) into this ordeal. Thanks for you input!

One time, I corrected one of those "his/her" things without any problems. Just to let you know... --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

On the userbox thing, I meant both his and her. I see what you mean with that rhythm thing. Kinda silly in my opinion...

On the argument thing, I (when I say "I," I refer to XIner) think it is under control. You may want to check out what is hapenning. It has become increaingly intense (and pointless...). --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Hooray for grammar. The argument is done. PHEW! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I've already pointed out that the argument was already pointless when you started it. I don't appreciate you messaging everyone considering it's resolved & that I wasn't the one doing the name calling.... Spawn Man 02:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

And I was NEVER sexist nor did I make sexual inuendo's!!!!!!!!!! I rue the fact you suggest so. I didn't know Cremepuff was a boy alright, so by me calling him a her was a complete mistake. Sorry if I don't think that Cremepuff is a masculine word! Yes, I immediately think buldging muscles & facial hair when the name Tinkerbell comes up, because Tinkerbell is indeed a feminine name. However, on the odd occasion, Tinkerbell can be used by a boy, as was the odd case for Cremepuff in this case. As I said to Xiner, Cremepuff called me a pervert, smelly, insignificant & many things else, while I only suggested his feelings were easily hurt. So don't you go around giving advice on how to convict me of sexual harrassment when I did not. I never will either. Spawn Man 02:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

The argument was resolved as a matter of fact... Spawn Man 02:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH! THIS ARGUMENT SHALL NOW END!!!!! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Spawn Man 04:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply on how to set up the Time Zone

Okay. How do you do it then?

SNOW MADNESS

I TAKE BACK ALL THAT I'VE SAID BEFORE ABOUT SNOW! I HAD TO SHOVEL 16 INCHES OFF OF MY GRANDPARENTS' DRIVEWAY, STREET, DECK, AND PATIO! ALSO, IT WAS COLD SNOW!! At least I made $40. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

It's quite loopy! (not crazy, curvy :) ) I LIKE IT A TON! I'M REALLY HYPER! HOW ABOUT YOU??? WHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Do you know how to figure out the size of an article? Like, in KBs? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

HHHHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. I can't really guestimate anything, as the only article I've seen with its size is my talk page. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello! I think I might be able to reduce the size of your signature. I'm going to have some fun in the sandbox! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

The same thing as what? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Cool. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

WOWZERZ! That's pretty nifty! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Can you teach me how? The directions aren't all that specific. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Monobook

Where can I find my monobook? Is it User:Cremepuff222/monobook? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

This is my exact signature, but the monobook thing doesn't seem to work...

<!--[[User:Cremepuff222/sigContract]];Cremepuff222--><span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 12pt">[[User:Cremepuff222|<font color="008000">--Cremepuff222</font>]] ([[User talk:Cremepuff222|<font color="2F4F4F">talk</font>]], [[User:Cremepuff222/Autograph Book|<font color="2F4F4F">sign book</font>]]) </span><!--ESC:Cremepuff222-->

--Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay. So is this right? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

And what's that NOTOC thing at the top of this page in the edit window? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Awesome. How come after adding a comment, my previous signatures aren't formatted like I want them? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

No. If you look at my above signatures, it appears to look like the default signautre style, but yours doesn't do that. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

User Page

I like your userpage's center title! It looks pretty sweet. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Two Comments

Comment #1! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment #2! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment #3! (I had to do this again, because I used the worng user name on the first two) Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment #4! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit Counter

Thank you! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Signature

Awesome! What was wrong with it? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book)

So in other words, it was caused by my laziness. :) Thanks for fixing it! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 22:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Article Size

Xiner told me how to find a page's size. Just copy the coding from the page and paste it into a text file (such as Microsoft Word, or Notepad). The, one can just look at the properties of the word document, and find its size. Pretty nifty, in my opinion. -Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 23:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

A New Barstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For helping new users (like me) and for recieving very little attention by other users, though you deserve it without a doubt. -Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 23:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Not at all! If you want to, you could like at how I formatted mine. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 23:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Two New Messages

Message Uno: Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Message Dos: Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Message Tres: It appears that my signature is working correctly now... Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Message Quatro: Never mind... Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey

do you have any tips on user pages and signatures and things for starters on Wikipedia? I want my home page to look a little like yours, if you don't mind. I don't know how to do any of that! You can visit my page and see the lameness of it. ♥Smartie960♥(Chatter Box) 21:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Umm....

Ok, how do I change the home page thingy to my name? ♥Smartie960♥(Chatter Box) 22:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

And ummm...

why did you put that bouncing wikipedia ball on the side of the screen? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smartie960 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC).

Yeah, about that ball..., what's it for again? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 22:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks a lot! ♥Smartie Pants♥ (talk • contribs) 23:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

A Medley of Responses

1. Yes, I have added the new coding, and 2. I created that RfA on the second day that I was on Wikipedia. I didn't realize the gravity of an RfA, so I guess that I will have to suffer in future attempts. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

A Medley of Responses to Responses to Responses :D

1. I've been on every day for a while, haven't you and
2. Same here.
3. Is your math test out of school? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Hooray for awesome colors! The only time I dislike a signature is if its coding is about ten lines long, so don't worry about it. :) ;) :D :B Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

A medley of math test reponses

I missed seven on my trimester test, but since I didn't ever miss school, it wasn't graded.

Nice job getting 100! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 21:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Are you a boy? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 23:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Ummmm, does your name not matter because you support gender-neutral language? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, sir or madam. I didn't see any other boxes on your userbox page that said your gender, so, yeah... Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

You are a male!! I just now looked at your real user page, so I didn't realize that you had userboxes there as well. Many ofthose poems on you ruser page my class and I have just finished reading..., weird!! I play the trumpet also, but I think that I am slightly more experienced (not trying to brag), and my younger sister used to play the oboe! More weirdness! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I think I have read a few of his on my free time. I like his writing style in The Bells, but I also like when he writes darker-styled poems. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

It's quite lively and repetitive, but it's also very descriptive. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: Your block of 207.144.220.3

Sorry that I'm responding so late! I've been torn with schoolwork at the moment and its going to be quite a busy week for me. Anyways, placing the schoolblock message on a talk page even though you are not the block administrator is quite acceptable. Just do not sign after the block message or the IP user may confuse you with the blocking admin.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

A Medley of Responses (this is getting kind of cliche) :D

Yes, Smartie does want to know where you got the logo. Thanks for pointing that out to me! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

First, I think that I'm using the heading way too often. Second, did you change your signature because it looks the same as always. I do like it, though. :) Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Please sign my autograph page

Please sign my autograph page. A•N•N•Afoxlover PLEASE SIGN, ANYONE!!! 19:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Autograph Book

I've seen that quote in many places. Though asking so many users (over 100) was spamming, deleting the page was kinda harsh. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Why is my user page nominated for deletion??!!??!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

AJMS

Hello Steptrip! I just notice that you created the page AJMS to redirect to Andrew Jackson Middle School. I'm not so sure if this is the greatest idea, since the acronym AJMS also stands for many other things. For instance, there are other middle schools which also share the acronym AJMS. Additionally, scholarly journals such as the American Journal of Medical Sciences, the Australian Journal of Medical Sciences and the African Journal of Marine Sciences. Although none of these have articles yet, if you do a simple Google Search for this acronym, Andrew Jackson Middle School doesn't appear until the seventh result. Perhaps it would do more benefit if you made AJMS into a disambiguation page. Or perhaps you could add a template such as this one:

{{for|other topics with this name|AJMS (disambiguation)}}

--Thank You! Sukh17 ^{Talk | Contribs} 02:11, 8 March 2007

• Just wanted to let you know that I replied to your message on my talk page. --Thank You! Sukh17 ^{Talk | Contribs} 06:26, 8 March 2007

Barnstar

Thanks a lot, Steptrip. =) Too bad I had to block your school's IP, but just to let you know, I had my school's IP blocked for 6 months hehe. Nishkid64 02:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

SNOW MADNESS

I TAKE BACK ALL THAT I'VE SAID BEFORE ABOUT SNOW! I HAD TO SHOVEL 16 INCHES OFF OF MY GRANDPARENTS' DRIVEWAY, STREET, DECK, AND PATIO! ALSO, IT WAS COLD SNOW!! At least I made $40. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

It's quite loopy! (not crazy, curvy :) ) I LIKE IT A TON! I'M REALLY HYPER! HOW ABOUT YOU??? WHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Do you know how to figure out the size of an article? Like, in KBs? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

HHHHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. I can't really guestimate anything, as the only article I've seen with its size is my talk page. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello! I think I might be able to reduce the size of your signature. I'm going to have some fun in the sandbox! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

The same thing as what? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Cool. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

WOWZERZ! That's pretty nifty! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Can you teach me how? The directions aren't all that specific. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Monobook

Where can I find my monobook? Is it User:Cremepuff222/monobook? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

This is my exact signature, but the monobook thing doesn't seem to work...

<!--[[User:Cremepuff222/sigContract]];Cremepuff222--><span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 12pt">[[User:Cremepuff222|<font color="008000">--Cremepuff222</font>]] ([[User talk:Cremepuff222|<font color="2F4F4F">talk</font>]], [[User:Cremepuff222/Autograph Book|<font color="2F4F4F">sign book</font>]]) </span><!--ESC:Cremepuff222-->

--Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay. So is this right? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

And what's that NOTOC thing at the top of this page in the edit window? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Awesome. How come after adding a comment, my previous signatures aren't formatted like I want them? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

No. If you look at my above signatures, it appears to look like the default signautre style, but yours doesn't do that. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

User Page

I like your userpage's center title! It looks pretty sweet. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 18:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Two Comments

Comment #1! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment #2! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment #3! (I had to do this again, because I used the worng user name on the first two) --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment #4! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit Counter

Thank you! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 19:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Signature

Awesome! What was wrong with it? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book)

So in other words, it was caused by my laziness. :) Thanks for fixing it! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 22:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Article Size

Xiner told me how to find a page's size. Just copy the coding from the page and paste it into a text file (such as Microsoft Word, or Notepad). The, one can just look at the properties of the word document, and find its size. Pretty nifty, in my opinion. -Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 23:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

A New Barstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For helping new users (like me) and for recieving very little attention by other users, though you deserve it without a doubt. -Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 23:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Not at all! If you want to, you could like at how I formatted mine. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 23:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Two New Messages

Message Uno: Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Message Dos: Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Message Tres: It appears that my signature is working correctly now... Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Message Quatro: Never mind... Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey

do you have any tips on user pages and signatures and things for starters on Wikipedia? I want my home page to look a little like yours, if you don't mind. I don't know how to do any of that! You can visit my page and see the lameness of it. ♥Smartie960♥(Chatter Box) 21:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Umm....

Ok, how do I change the home page thingy to my name? ♥Smartie960♥(Chatter Box) 22:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

And ummm...

why did you put that bouncing wikipedia ball on the side of the screen? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smartie960 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC).

Yeah, about that ball..., what's it for again? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 22:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks a lot! ♥Smartie Pants♥ (talk • contribs) 23:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

A Medley of Responses

1. Yes, I have added the new coding, and 2. I created that RfA on the second day that I was on Wikipedia. I didn't realize the gravity of an RfA, so I guess that I will have to suffer in future attempts. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

A Medley of Responses to Responses to Responses :D

1. I've been on every day for a while, haven't you and
2. Same here.
3. Is your math test out of school? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Hooray for awesome colors! The only time I dislike a signature is if its coding is about ten lines long, so don't worry about it. :) ;) :D :B Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

A medley of math test reponses

I missed seven on my trimester test, but since I didn't ever miss school, it wasn't graded.

Nice job getting 100! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 21:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Are you a boy? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 23:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Ummmm, does your name not matter because you support gender-neutral language? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, sir or madam. I didn't see any other boxes on your userbox page that said your gender, so, yeah... Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

You are a male!! I just now looked at your real user page, so I didn't realize that you had userboxes there as well. Many ofthose poems on you ruser page my class and I have just finished reading..., weird!! I play the trumpet also, but I think that I am slightly more experienced (not trying to brag), and my younger sister used to play the oboe! More weirdness! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I think I have read a few of his on my free time. I like his writing style in The Bells, but I also like when he writes darker-styled poems. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

It's quite lively and repetitive, but it's also very descriptive. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: Your block of 207.144.220.3

Sorry that I'm responding so late! I've been torn with schoolwork at the moment and its going to be quite a busy week for me. Anyways, placing the schoolblock message on a talk page even though you are not the block administrator is quite acceptable. Just do not sign after the block message or the IP user may confuse you with the blocking admin.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

A Medley of Responses (this is getting kind of cliche) :D

Yes, Smartie does want to know where you got the logo. Thanks for pointing that out to me! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

First, I think that I'm using the heading way too often. Second, did you change your signature because it looks the same as always. I do like it, though. :) Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Please sign my autograph page

Please sign my autograph page. A•N•N•Afoxlover PLEASE SIGN, ANYONE!!! 19:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Autograph Book

I've seen that quote in many places. Though asking so many users (over 100) was spamming, deleting the page was kinda harsh. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Why is my user page nominated for deletion??!!??!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks a lot, Steptrip. =) Too bad I had to block your school's IP, but just to let you know, I had my school's IP blocked for 6 months hehe. Nishkid64 02:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Cool!!

Wowzers!! That must have taken a long time to make, and it looks really cool!! I attempted to make my name like that, but it is very time-consuming and frustrating. Thank you! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 00:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Monobook Issues

Hello! I recently tried adding something to my monobook, but the signature one freaked out, and now it's all weird. Do you think you could look at it? I removed the one that I was trying to add, so it's only the signature one. Thanks! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Wowzerz! What a heated debate! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

And I don't think the monobook issue is a problem either becuase it's still working. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

If you want to find the coding, just look at the previous comment on my talk page.

Also, though the "cheers and good day" on your signature may make somebody's day, I think that you should probably get rid of it. But feel free to do what you want! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

That's pretty ironic. Ha, ha, ha, ha! :) Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Oops. Forgot to sign. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

The fact that "cheers and good day" is surrounded by angry users throwing grenades at eachother. Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

More Issues

I tried to add your monobook stuff to mine, but it's totally freaking out. Do you think you could lend me a hand? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Should I add it again? I already have it there... Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

It's still freaking out. -Cremepuff222 01:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

The script is all jumbled up! EEEEEEEEEEEKKKK! -Cremepuff222 02:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Yours looks fine. I did do the cache thingy. -Cremepuff222 02:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

I just changed it back to when it worked. Let's just forget about it. Thank you for helping me!! -Cremepuff222 02:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, way back when it worked it looked similar to your monobook, but now it's all messed up, so I thought that someting was wrong with it. It doesn't matter though, as it's currently working.

I have to go now. Thanks for your help! -Cremepuff222 02:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

User name...

Hello! Why are yo going to change your name to King of Spades? I saw that you posted a message on your adoptee's talk page..., I was just wondering. -Cremepuff222 23:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, Mr. Fan is in the same timezone as I, which is exactly one hour before yours. He's on right now if you would like to talk to him. You'll have to ask him why he hasn't been on recently... -Cremepuff222 23:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry!

I couldn't get on the computer for reasons I will not specify.

P.S. Did you notice you have a bouncing wikipedia icon at the bottom of your screen? :-) Chiefsfan364 (talk) 23:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Whoops. Forgot to sign the first time!

Yay!

Thank you! It looks so awesome! I think I might cry. Sniff.. And yes, you have the exact time! I mean right to this minute, EXACT! Chiefsfan364 (talk) 23:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

On the Matter of the Prank Page

Actually, I stole it from Cremepuff, who, I'm guessing, stole it from you. :) Chiefsfan364 (talk) 23:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Per your request, I've deleted these pages, you can use {{db-author}} in the future to speedy-delete your user subpages. I did not jupe the pages though, as they are unlikely to get recreaetd by someone else. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

You dont' have to tag them that way, but if you do they will show up in CAT:CSD and a patroling admin will take care of it for you. Have a nice day! — xaosflux ^Talk 15:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Signature

Like my new signature? -Cremepuff222 01:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

I changed my signature because people without the contraction thing in the monobook said that the coding was 10 lines long. Yes, I do use IE, Version 7. ---Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Sure. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 02:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Ads

Awesome adds, I'm glad that someone who is not a participant in WP:WPUS is that gifted in computer coding, especially in Cascading Style Sheets (I have seen a total of 2 Wikipedians who appear gifted in .css and are not participants in the aforementioned project).  ~Steptrip 23:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm not that good with CSS, and I know pretty much nothing about JavaScript, which is what the WPUS people tend to me most skilled with. I imagine the people who created and maintain MediaWiki:Common.css and MediaWiki:Monobook.css know a thing or two – Qxz 10:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Did AzaToth or yourself make the ads ?  ~Steptrip 11:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, I came up with the idea; so far AzaToth has made Image:Qxz-ad2.gif and Image:Qxz-ad10.gif and I've made the others. I don't know if he has any others planned; I plan to do them on request unless I think of something else specific – Qxz 11:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

RfA

Hi Steptrip, I care about every vote, for, oppose, or neutral, and I appreciate everyone who bothers to take a look at it. Hopefully I'll have more to say after it closes. :) Xiner (talk, email) 20:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

reply...

I've replied to your message, on my talk page. The Transhumanist   20:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Your user page

Do you realize that your userpage was edited by some anon user? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 23:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I see. Chiefsfan was recently active, he seems to ask me questions more often than he asks you. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 23:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Do you think that you could participate in my editor review? --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 23:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Look at this comment that he made today. I hope that answers all of your questions! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 23:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks for the tips!! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 00:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I do. I'm also teaching myself some perl, and hopefully I'll learn PHP, Java, Python, and C++ in the near future. What does that script do? (the one you told me about in my editor review) --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 00:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

By the way, I'm now using FireFox. I must say, I like it better than Internet Explorer! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 00:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah! I see it now! I'll look into making a bot, but I'm not greatly experienced in the latter of the two languages. The coolest program that I've made is a nifty game that's quite pointless, yet unusually addicting! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 00:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I already have, along with some other stuff. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 00:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Monobook

Sadly, I did copy them from another user. The things included are very useful, but the link to my talk page is in a different language. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 00:54, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm not positive, but I think that it was User:Celestianpower. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 01:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for telling me about the motto Wikiproject! I think that my name will be pretty well-known there. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 01:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

A new bot...

Hello! If you haven't already noticed, Werdnabot hasn't been archiving, so I recommend going here. The bot automatically switches archives when it reaches a certain size, and you don't need one of those distracting werdnabot messages. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 22:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Cool. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 22:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi Steptrip. I promised I'd write more when the RfA closes, so here I am. Thank you for taking the time to put in your thoughts; no RfA vote is trivial and I certainly appreciated your strong support. Rest assured that I have heard every voice loud and clear during the discussion, and will strive to use the mop carefully and responsibly. Thank you for your support. Please don't hesitate to give me constructive criticism anytime. Xiner (talk, email) 00:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, bringer of good news! Congrats on your successful RfA, Xiner! --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book, review me!) 01:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, if I may, please consider this friendly advice. If you want to be a great editor, don't ask people to sign your autograph book. Tell you what, do some amazing things on Wikipedia, like anti-vandalism work, and I'll consider it. Xiner (talk, email) 01:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure I've seen you before, then. I see very nice edit summaries and varied contributions. Cool! Xiner (talk, email) 01:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I concur with Xiner's statement above. With a little more editting experience, I think that you could become a great administrator, Steptrip! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Of course! I think that you're a great helper to users in need of assistance, and you have a great understanding of Wikipedia's guidelines and rules. I, on the other hand, have ten times as much user page edits than my mainspace edits. It'll take a while for me to dig out of this hole, but you have a clean slate. All that you need to do is to keep doing what you're doing, and you'll be on the road to adminship! By the way, there's no need to be flabbergasted... :) --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:48, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Your edit summaries make me laugh! He, he, he, he...! :) --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I need to go so that I can study for my nonfiction final. If I don't, I'll fail, and if I do, I'll get a D-. (Have I ever mentioned that I greatly dislike literature class? Don't respond, because I really need to study). Nevertheless, see ya on Wiki tomorrow, Mr. Bringer of Good News! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Field Trip

You get to go to NYC? Is it a band trip or something? (I studied for a good 10 minutes, a new record!) --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

That's cool. I'll be going to Chicago next year for band, but otherwise, I'm stuck with living in the corn state. This conversation has changed a lot. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Editor review

Hi Steptrip. I didn't want you to think I've forgotten about you, so I'm dropping by before I retire to bed. Quick comments: your user and talk pages don't look very good in Firefox 2 at 800x600. I understand it's not a common configuration, but it'd be nice if the great graphics are laid out well on the screen. Your signature is a bit too long for my taste. Sorry they're criticisms. I'll have nicer ones tomorrow, hopefully. Xiner (talk, email) 03:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

The trouble with signature scripts is that for most people, who don't have them, your signature takes up seven full lines in the edit box. Xiner (talk, email) 13:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

AJMS

Hello Steptrip! I just notice that you created the page AJMS to redirect to Andrew Jackson Middle School. I'm not so sure if this is the greatest idea, since the acronym AJMS also stands for many other things. For instance, there are other middle schools which also share the acronym AJMS. Additionally, scholarly journals such as the American Journal of Medical Sciences, the Australian Journal of Medical Sciences and the African Journal of Marine Sciences. Although none of these have articles yet, if you do a simple Google Search for this acronym, Andrew Jackson Middle School doesn't appear until the seventh result. Perhaps it would do more benefit if you made AJMS into a disambiguation page. Or perhaps you could add a template such as this one:

{{for|other topics with this name|AJMS (disambiguation)}}

--Thank You! Sukh17 ^{Talk | Contribs} 02:11, 8 March 2007

• Just wanted to let you know that I replied to your message on my talk page. --Thank You! Sukh17 ^{Talk | Contribs} 06:26, 8 March 2007

Pattern of reverting?

Greetings can you kindly explain why you've just reverted my edit to Submission (film)? I am seeing that you are doing a series of reversions and if they are of the same type as mine you will likely be prevented from further editing. (→Netscott) 22:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm not so sure about having to be blocked and Steptrip's past contributions don't really form a pattern, but I also think that Netscott's edit was fine. Some people may not now what assassinated means, so I think that a wikilink is a good idea. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 22:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: Your predicted outcome of my hypothetical RfA

Hello Steptrip! Sorry this response is so late! As you can tell from my talk page notice and inactivity, I've been quite busy lately...I understand you would appreciate my feedback on the matter but I would like to direct you to a similar question from Penwhale which I answered with the following. The best way to prepare for the process of an RfA is to have an editor review if you have not already done so.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 02:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Editor review

I've reviewed you too. Sorry for my late timing, I've been (and still am) on a semi-wikibreak. Peace, ♣Tohru Honda13♣ 23:20, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

A few short comments corroborating what others have said. Keep doing RC patrol, and take a look at WP:UCFD, WP:TFD, and WP:CFD. Xiner (talk, email) 16:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Smile

Bot?

What bot are you referring to? (→Netscott) 07:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Given the absolutely nonsense revert your vandal tool engaged in my tongue-in-cheek WTF edit summary can be excused. (→Netscott) 07:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

It's all good. I appreciate the apology. Thanks. (→Netscott) 07:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Lobelia

Please could you unrevert my edit to the article on Lobelia erinus. The conventional capitalisation is as in the article title. Thanks SP-KP 17:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

No, please leave it as is. It's a scientific name, as opposed to an English one, and botanical convention (and MoS) for these is that the genus (first word) is initial-capitalised and the specific epithet (second word) plus any subsequent words indicating subspecies/forms etc are all lower-case. Don't ask me why, but that's just the way it is! SP-KP 17:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

You're back!

How was your trip? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 18:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

That sounds pretty AMAZING (excluding the fact of having bad weather)! I should consider going to Andrew Jackson Middle School! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 18:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Yepperz, to both questions. On IE, they used to look fine, but when I switched to FireFox, they freaked out. I suppose it's a browser problem. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 18:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

It's not greatly important, but is there away to remove the spacing between the icons on my navigation menu? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!)

I see you improved my menu! Thank you very much! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 18:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply

The blocking issue is fine, you shouldn't be sorry because he used his account vandal-only. I have done all that Xiner's said. I use Windows XP (I'm not sure of the specific version). --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 18:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, I figured that FireFox and Safari must view pages in a similar way since the user that I got it from included both, so I just decided to keep it. Is that bad?? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 18:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I got it from a User:Goyston, who got it from an User:ElAmericano. I modified the page extensively to make it my own. I got the web browser from someone else, I'm not sure who (or is it whom?) though. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 19:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, wrong links... --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 19:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar for you!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your excellent work in reverting vandalism, you totally deserve this. Peace, ♣Tohru Honda13♣ 00:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm giving out barnstars to random users. I'm checking their conrtibs and giving them an appropriate barnstar. You're first, of course. Cheers! Peace, ♣Tohru Honda13♣ 00:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Uh.. so far, User:AMAPO, User:Cremepuff222... and I think that's it for now. Those are the recent ones; I've given MANY to User:Poetic Decay and User:Arjun01. I think I've lost count of the other users... and uh, pardon my stupidity, but what's a cabal? And I'm giving barnstars when I have the chance (I'm editing and finishing homework). :P Peace, ♣Tohru Honda13♣ 01:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Smile!

Saber girl08 04:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Hahah

When you placed the fake blocked message I was like what the heck did I do lol THANKS! :) WikiMan53 (talk • contribs • count) | Can I have your autograph? 20:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, very much!

Thanks for the award, Steptrip! It makes me feel a lot better after running three miles (that's for sure! :) ). Have I seriously made more edits than you? I have about 1500 talk page edits (more than half my total...). --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Also, my user page edits only account for about 10% of my overall edits, just to point it out. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I suppose you're right. Yes, I did get my userpage (and several subpages) deleted. You may want to consider doing this on some of your higher-edit pages. Thanks again for the award! I have quite a collection now adays. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Templates

Sorry I took so long to reply, I was running. (comma splice!!!). I was told before that the templates don't have to be used in order, and I also believe that I've read it somewhere. I guess that what everyone else is doing (especially sysops) is the correct way to do things.

I saw your comment on my editcountitis motto, any suggestions for improvement? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh! How can I help you with it? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Cool! Where can I find the template? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I just made it so that the signature is automatically added when transcluded. You can edit it if you want. Otherwise, I think that it's fine! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Oops, sorry about that. I actually did fairly well, 96%. It's not as high as I would like it, but it's a good way to start the trimester! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

That phrase of yours is quite comedic! ;) I do believe that my mainspace percentage has increased to about 15%. Excluding talk page edits, I think that it is a bit higher. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Considering Fan's latest contributions, it seems that he isn't on anymore... --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007

I disagree with the chages you have made here. I have reverted them, and am using this note to let you know that I have done so, so that we can discuss the best way to handle the situation. (note: this comment was previously posted in a different form) Jouster  (whisper) 01:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

(1)The way I edited the template was in a manner that was still grammatically correct (2) I see no citations posted by other users who have edited the same template (3) How is my edit considered vandalism and (4) Could you please restore my edit.  ~Steptrip 01:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

In point of fact, your edit was specifically not grammatically-correct. You violated the words of the userbox in question—you ended a sentence in a preposition! While the resulting sentence structure is indeed archaic and alarming, the irony thereof is a big portion of the appeal of that userbox. If you would like a version of the userbox ironic in that it supports ending a sentence with a preposition by using a sentence ending in a preposition, feel free to fork the box into your own userspace and include a link to it in the <noinclude> section.

I specifically did not consider your edits to be vandalism, but based on your edit summary, "reworded statement, yet still abiding by the userbox," your statement was factually incorrect. I used the best template I could find—not a vandalism template!—to express this concern. Having read through some of your contributions more closely, it would appear the mistake was unintentional, so please don't feel slighted by the appearance of a UW template on your Talk page. It was merely the fastest device with which to record both my reversion and my dissatisfaction with your edit summary's characterization of your changes.

If I am wrong in all of this, and due to some particularly-obscure rule of grammar, "up" in the sentence in question does not constitute a preposition, please enlighten me. Barring that, I do not feel that it would be appropriate to revert back to your version at this time. Furthermore, I appreciate you not engaging in a revert war, but taking this to Talk pages, instead. I have your Talk page on my watchlist now, so feel free to respond here so I can keep the conversation in context.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask them. I hope what I've said makes sense! It would seem that you are the more-senior editor here, so let me know if I've handled this incorrectly.

Jouster  (whisper) 08:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

unconstructive edit?

"However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Ian MacKaye, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted."

i removed the words, "In an ironic twist of fate, MacKaye died of a heroin overdose in his Washington, D.C. home on March 21, 2007.", which are factually incorrect. who are you, and how is this an "unconstructive" edit, and why have you changed it back to the factually incorrect version?

- jim —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.178.98.128 (talk) 01:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC).

Looks like a misclick; he's fixed it. I'd encourage you to create an account, so that if, in the future, someone from your IP address does commit vandalism and forces a softblock, you can still edit the Project. See Why create an account?. Jouster  (whisper) 07:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Your question

It would be an adverb since it tells where the user "will put." I have no problem with it, as I'm educated enough to know that "up" in this case wold be an adverb, but it would also be a good idea for the up not be included, so that the users who don't know that up can be an adverd will still understand the box. I think that the vandalism warning was highly unnecessary, and Jouster should probably get rid of it and replace it with a less intense message. Best of luck! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 20:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay dokay... --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 21:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandal block

I'll probably issue a long block, but I won't do an indefinite block for an IP. Nishkid64 21:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Talk Page Formatting

Hi! Please correct or remove the CSS that is causing the display error shown here . I am seeing this using Firefox 2.0.0.3. Jouster  (whisper) 21:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Update: it appears that the "steptrip" text is floating at the same spot on the screen, which, when scrolled all the way up, puts it over top of the navigation box. While I admire your talent as expressed by this capability, your page is very ungainly and difficult to navigate as a result. Jouster  (whisper) 21:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I put the logo there because if I put it on the right side, then it would cover up messages. The nuts-and-bolts of why I have it there is because I wanted a link back to my userpage, but since I already have one that causes no interference with the monobook skin, it will be removed shortly.  ~Steptrip 21:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

(1) and (2) go to your userpage, and (3) could conceivably go there (and frankly, it's a little confusing that it does not). Jouster  (whisper) 21:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply

Please see the reply on my user talk and in your e-mail inbox. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 01:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

You have another message. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 01:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry!

I am sorry that I did not see that message. Cremepuff told me that there are special tools you can use for editing and spell-checking, and that they had to do with his monobook. Chiefsfan364 (talk) 01:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

P.S. This will be the only message I can send tonight. Sorry again... Chiefsfan364 (talk) 01:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Response to Irony

Very ironic indeed! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

On Domthedude001's amazing userpage, he has an external link to his website.On his site, there is a test to see how good of a hacker one is. I passed it without a problem, but Fan couldn't get past the last level. You should give it a try! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Are you kidding me? Go right click, view page source. Then, you'll find a couple if statements, just find what the "true" condition is. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Did you figure it out? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Look at the URL address. See anything that looks "incorrect"? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Just change "Incorrect" to "Correct". --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Ha, ha. I have a Wikipedia friend named Computernurd22, just to throw it out there. Did you pass it? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

That's nice. Nurd hasn't tried it yet, but I'll be sure to ask him to sometime soon. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Magic Words

Do you know how to use magic words and parser functions on Wikipedia? I have about 15 userboxes that I could merge into one if I knew how to use them. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

You can tell me tomorrow, I'm going to bed. It's 10:30 where you live, right? I'd better not keep you up too late. See ya tomorrow! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Question on MOTD

I have a question as well, can I make a decision on whether or not a motto is approved, and if I can, how do I reopen it (I know how to list it on the approved list), and how do I decide a scheduled date if it is approved and if I can even approve/disapprove mottos.  ~Steptrip 00:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Of course you can! This is a wiki, and anyone can close a nomination. If you'd like to help close some, follow the closing procedure on the nominations page. I've left a summary of how to close a nomination, as well as how to decide the outcome of a nomination here.

To schedule a motto, again, carefully read the procedure on either the schedule or the approved page. But, since you asked specifically, here's a summary of how to schedule a motto:

1. Select the first of the approved mottos.
2. Cut it from the approved list, and paste it into one of the daily subpages (e.g. Wikipedia:Motto of the day/January 1, 2000)

   To choose a day, pick the earliest one that's available (e.g. if you look on the schedule page and see that at the very bottom, August 1 is scheduled, but August 2 is not, add the motto to the August 2 subpage.

3. Use the syntax: <tt>[[PAGENAME|MONTH-DAY]]</tt> {{PAGENAME}}<br /> to display the new subpage (and motto) on the schedule page.

Try to follow the example of what mottos are already there, and if you have any other questions, just contact me on my talk page. --Tewy 00:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

To reopen a nomination, do you just cut the motto and post it at the top of the "in review" section?  ~Steptrip 00:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, exactly, but make sure to mark it as reopened. --Tewy 00:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

How many votes does a nomination need to be approved?  ~Steptrip 00:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

There's not really a set number, as was mentioned here, because it's really a case-by-case basis. If a nomination has just a few votes, but they're all support, the motto could probably be approved (assuming the votes are valid, hopefully with good reasons). But if they're weak support, or maybe an oppose is thrown in, then it's not obvious that the motto should be approved, and you might want to gather some more opinions. The ones you approve should be the clear winners. Ask yourself, does the community want this as their motto of the day? Or is there some doubt? Are there those who give reasons why they don't think it should be the motto of the day? If so, you may want to reopen the discussion for a while, to get some more opinions, and to see if the consensus can start leaning in one direction. Being approved is a priveledge, I suppose, not the default. --Tewy 01:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Be sure that when you reopen a nomination, you include the entire discussion, not just the motto itself. --Tewy 02:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Would it be time to decide on mottos (the ones posted before 03/15)?  ~Steptrip 00:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

You can decide on any mottos older than 14 days at any time. In fact, that's a good thing, because it spreads the workload out over several days. --Tewy 01:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I've revised the procedures on the nominations page, to address some of the "FAQs" on my talk page, but you can revise them further if there's a part that might confuse someone. --Tewy 04:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help. I'll attempt it right now... --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh no! It didn't work! Perhaps if I tell you what I want the box to do, you will be able to help me better. The first parameter specifies the color, for example, if the user want ed the userbox to be green, the box would be {{User:Cremepuff222/User Friend|Green}}. The if statement would determine the color of each color of the box (border, id box, text color). Then, the second parameter specifies the user, which works like a charm. Here's what the box currently looks like:

{{Userbox |border-c=#00FF00 |border-s=1 |id-c=#ADFF2F|id-s=12 |id-fc=#32CD32 |info-c=#32CD32 |info-s=9 |info-fc=#ADFF2F |id=Friend |info=This user knows {{{2}}}.}}
Thanks for helping me... --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm too busy! I'm on the verge on figuring it out!! I'll try if mine doesn't work... --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

I'M DONE WITH IT!!

GUESS WHAT, STEPTRIP!!! I FINISHED IT!! Here's how you can use it...

{{User:Cremepuff222/User Friend|'''''Color'''''|'''''Name of friend'''''}}

For the color parameter, you may do either Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, or Purple (be sure to capitalize the first letter!). You should also check out the code for it (quite crazy...). --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Leave out the quotes in the parameter... --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

He, he, he. It was mostly copy and pasting. Yes, I simply love programming! I've made several games on my graphing calculator, as well as on my computer! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Awesome! I downloaded some perl software, but my dad got mad and made me delete it. He also deleted my Firefox, but I put it on my flashdrive so he coouldn't find it on the hardrive... (I know, so naughty). Perl is a pretty simple starting language, but I recommend learning Python or BASIC (if not regular BASIC, TI-BASIC, which is calculator language, my first programming language). --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Umm, yes, BASIC is basically a pretty basic programming language for basic people like you and me who like to create basic things such as a basic calcul... --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

hey

Can you do this for me to see if it works on your computer? OK, follow these steps:

1. Go to my user page.
2. Click the link Articles!
3. Does it work?

--Yummie 19:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar of Good Humor

Thanks for the barnstar - I didn't even realise it until now (I don't usually chack that page, I expect awards to be posted on my talk but don't worry).

Your work on MOTD has been quite good too, I thought you made a blunder relisting "If this is your limit, you can't exceed it; If you exceed it, it's not your limit" which had three supports but I see that the limit hasn't been quite decided yet...what limit did you have in mind?

BTW, do you know Cremepuff from real life? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 11:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

By limit I mean the number of supports the motto has to have before it is approved. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 00:00, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean by "raise me up?" --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 00:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

My IQ

I have no clue. Is there some sort of test to take so that one can figure it out? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Have you ever taken an IQ test? If so, what is it? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

So, yours is 133? Let's see if I can beat it... (I may not be around for a while, since I'll soon be attempting the test...) --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I answered 35ish questions just to be prompted for an Email address (of which I don't have)!! :( --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll try that sometime. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Just because you asked brought it up recently, I took that test that you linked to on Cremepuff's talk (I think), and got a 131. However, last time I took a proctered test, it was 135. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 00:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

My IQ must have increased quite a bit considering that I graduated fom the adoption program!! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Adoption

Forgive me in advance if this is not the correct method to address you. I was happy to receive your offer of adoption but in the time it took me to respond you have apparently rescinded my "obligation" to be adopted. Does this mean that you no longer wish to adopt me or that I committed some infraction in the adoption process that I am unawares of. Thanks. EuroTrash 15:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks very much for accepting to adopt me. I guess my first question is about how to include sources that are not online such as a book, page number etc. I had made an addition to the page on Sea Shepherd Society with some quotes from a book written by Paul Watson. I included the quotes, the book and page number but they were removed for not being inputted properly. I've been having trouble figuring out how I erred. Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks. EuroTrash 19:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

AWB Approval

I noticed that you have recently approved a plethora of users for AWB, myself included, yet I did not see my name on the Check Page. can I still download and run AWB?  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 16:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry, you're there :-) It's just at the top instead of in alphabetical order to keep track of people that were just added. —METS501 (talk) 17:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I applied for autoWiki before I got 500 mainspace edits, and I passed. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 19:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I see. Is there any particular reason for that? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 19:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Can't you just apply again later? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 19:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay. On a random note, is there some sort of rule that explains how one should format messages on a talk page? For expamle, I alternate my indent each time, but other user's (like you) increase the indent amount every time. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 19:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Did you not see that message I left you about two sections above? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 19:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay Dokay! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 19:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Well..., I left a comment on her talk page about it, so I think that it's pretty much over. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 19:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Also, I already have posted my name there, but I should probably update some statistics... --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 19:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Signature

Looks nice, a little long though. I recommend you remove the "You raise me up" link, since it will make the sig shorter, and it won't link to an old editor review in a month, a year, ect. I don't usually do editor review, but if there is anything in particular you want my opinion about, just let me know, Prodego ^talk 21:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

My ErR thanks

Hi. Thanks for complimenting me on the editor review. I use edit summaries a lot because I enabled "prompt me when leaving a blank edit summary", but for some reason, it prompts me when I undo vandalism, but not when I use popups. Anyway, I usually just create articles, revert vandalism, and add info to mainspace. I am on almost every day, but there's rarely a lot to do in mainspace. I also participate a lot in other things, such as MOTD. Thanks for the complimets and advice. Thank you. AstroHurricane001^{(Talk+Contribs+Ubx)} 22:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: RFA Message

Yeah, I substituted it. I was too lazy to rewrite it all those times, or copy+paste it. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 23:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

No worries. And I'm a he, just for reference. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 23:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

vandalproof moderation

Ask betacommand or amidaniel --froth^t 00:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Gave My Review

I left my review for you Steptrip :)...¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 16:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

New Menu!!

Hey, Steptrip! How about you......., CHECK OUT MY NEW MENU!!!! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

To be honest, I have no clue. I just found a similar menu elsewhere and modified it. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 20:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

User:Qxz

To be perfectly honest I'm not entirely sure. I've had a look through his contribs and those he interacted with about 10:30 yesterday morning. I have a few ideas but not enough to want to write them down, as that would unfair and speculation can be often more damaging than the truth. I've kept an eye on his comments as he's deleted posts to his talk page, and can only hope he cools down, as no matter what he thinks he was handy to have around on the templates, and certainly some of us thought his and Aza's ad banners were something fresh round here. Sorry I can't give you any more info. Regards ^Khukri 08:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Mainspace Edits

Don't fret! I am working on a an article even as I type, and before I got your message. I actually made that pizza article for a vocab paragraph, so don't worry about me spending time on senseless garbage. Cremepuff will vouch for me. He got the same assignment! Cheers! :) Chiefsfan364 (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Monobook

Cremepuff told me in person about how the monobook affects a user's editing ability, that certain codes allow for certain actions, such as a spell check. How does that work? Chiefsfan364 (talk) 01:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Signature

I don't mind either when it comes to coding size, but the second looks better. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 22:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Spoiler tags

On the Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader? page, you asked in an edit summary why the statistics section needed spoiler tags. I live on the west coast, and on March 22, 2007, I looked up it's Wikipedia article. The Statistics section included information as to how far the contestant had progressed in the show, presumably from someone who lives on the east coast who watched the show three hours earlier. This is why I added a Spoiler tag to the section. -- RoninBK _{T C} 00:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

(In response to comment left on my Talk,) My personal opinion is that I don't like these sections in general, especially for television shows in their first season. I think it tends to lead to WP:CRUFT, and includes information that may not be considered interesting ten years from now. However I'm not pushing for that at this point. I do think that SOME reference should be made though, perhaps somethign like {{In-progress tvshow}} or something.

help!

I am in my sandbox, working on a new signature. I am trying to clean it up, but its frustrating work! Do you think you could help me? Chiefsfan364 (talk) 01:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello?

Are you still there? There was an edit conflict, and I'm not sure if you saw my message, due to the fact it is above the other one. This is what I have so far- User:Chiefsfan364/SandboxChiefsfan364 (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Page Protection

Sorry for the vandalism. I've reprotected your userpage for 3 fortnights, hopefully that will be long enough to be rid of them! Thanks, — xaosflux ^Talk 01:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

He didn't

Adams didn't do that. He just was logged on when I, Mr. Fan, wrote that message. I tried to come up with some sort of sig, but that didn't work. sorry! --Mr. Fan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adams921 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC).

No, Adams has not been adopted. He is not very smart, putting his last name, and my last name also. I AM NOT ADAMS921! --Mr. Fan

Adoption

Adams921- You can adopt me. Chiefsfan- I really wish I was logged on right now... :) Adams921 01:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Confused in Confusionland

Am I the only one that's confused by the precious two comments? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

My Comments

Duly noted.--Dr who1975 02:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Your userpage

No problem Step. It looks better that way. ;-) Anyways, I copied it from two other people, so it's not really "my" page after all. Also, I notice you say "Do not edit this page" and "Do not vandalize", but that complex, incomprehensible coding is where vandals do their worst... Put your main page coding in a subpage, then add it to your main page as if it were a template (with double brackets around the page name); that makes your page come up, but "Vandalproof"! :-) Good luck! · AO ^Talk 08:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply

To prevent a forest fire, I've replied to you at User_talk:Xaosflux#Unprotection. Thanks, — xaosflux ^Talk 02:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Hidden Text

Did you get that idea of hidden text at the top of your talk page from my userpage?  ~Steptrip 02:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Which hidden text? — zero » 02:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

The first text that you can see between <!----> if you click on the "edit this page" button.  ~Steptrip 02:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Do you mean the code in User:Z.E.R.O./Title? — zero » 02:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that page, and this one.  ~Steptrip 02:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I am using the same hidden code as yours but with some alteration. — zero » 02:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Example:

<!-- 
======================================================================================================================================
{{HEADER}}:

{{TEXT}} 

{{CLOSING}}, 


{{SIGNATURE}}
======================================================================================================================================
-->

— zero » 02:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply

I have replied to you on my talk page. This message is in case you don't have my talk page on your watchlist, or you are an IP who doesn't have a watchlist. --TeckWiz^ParlateContribs_@

 :)

Please sign my sig book! :) (not)(listening)

Hello

I see you found my brother's page, ! He isn't on wikipedia very much, but I think I can change that! [[User:Chiefsfan364]|Chiefsfan364][[User:Chiefsfan364/Talk]|(talk)]]

Review

Hi Steptrip, just to let you know, I'm a bit busy today to review you, but I will certainly give you one either tomorrow or monday. Hope thats OK for you, regards Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 17:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

...!

!!! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

IP

May I ask why? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I think it is. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm literally hysterical!! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)