Talk:Anita Blake mythology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Deletion
150, could you explain your deletion? As it stands, I'm inclined to revert, but I'd like to address your concern if I can. Thanks, TheronJ 14:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Too long
Uggh. The mythology page is too long and getting longer, and the table of contents now runs six levels deep. We should probably break it up, but there are a truckload of inbound links all over the novel and character pages. I'll think about whether there's an automated way to fix the links. TheronJ 14:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Looking at it, I would say that ideally it could do with being split into about four separate articles: vampires, shapeshifters, other supernatural creatures and humans. That would seem to be the most logical division and would probably make it more user friendly too in some ways, because it is a long article to read. Silverthorn 16:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe I'll give it a shot this weekend, particularly if autowikibrowser can fix the links. TheronJ 17:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- The Vampires information has been moved to a separate article Silverthorn 10:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- The Shapeshifters information has also been moved. Silverthorn 10:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- The Humans information has also been moved as it too seemed long enough to justify its own article Silverthorn 09:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Quetzalcoatl
We learn quite a bit about Quetzalcoatls and a little of dragons in general on page 544 of Obsidian Butterfly. I'm going to write up a paragraph or so and stick it uder 'Dragons,' unless anyone has any objections. Anakalypsis 03:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Necromancers
One area of mythology that is missing is that of Necromancers. Necromancers, particularly Anita Blake as a Necromancer, play a significant role in the overall series story arc and in the Mother of All Darkness story arc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveras (talk • contribs) 15:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)