Talk:Anisotropy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on May 31, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Pronunciation: an.IS.o.trop.y, right? stress on second sylable... 68.107.83.19 01:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- I guess that's what happens when you have a five-syllable word. Sure doesn't seem right, though.... 24.6.66.193 (talk) 15:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't this be combined with isotropic? –radiojon 04:54, 2004 Jun 15 (UTC)
- I have no clear opinion... but if it should, shouldn't the merged article be put at isotropy? Fredrik (talk) 09:20, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
You both have way too much time on your hands. Get a hobby...--192.28.2.17 17:51, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
It would be nice to have a visual example of what an Anisotropic Filter (for example, in computer graphics) does exactly. Like the images available at the antialiasing page. --Numsgil 01:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Isotropy should point to the correct article, not the disambiguation page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.186.24.99 (talk) 16:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "inc" ??
From the article:
"Some materials conduct heat inc, that is independent of spatial orientation around the heat source."
This sentence stops making sense around "inc, that". I can't decode it well enough to even consider rephrashing it. Anybody?... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.79.100.238 (talk) 11:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
