User talk:ANHL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Aviation WikiProject Newsletter

The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 17:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sarina State High School

Did you read the article before you slapped the advert tag on it?

I think it is actually a quite derogitory nasty piece of work. Garrie 03:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 13:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Société Dyn'Aero

A tag has been placed on Société Dyn'Aero, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Fordan (talk) 23:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Elliot Joseph Prior

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zedla (talk) 08:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Redirect of Elliot Prior

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Elliot Prior, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Elliot Prior is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Elliot Prior, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Elliot Prior

Hello, what would you like to discuss? I nominated the page for speed deletion as the non-existent move/redirect appeared to me as a test page. You may also want to discuss this matter with the deleting admin or the CSDWarnBot in the article log mentioned above. – Zedla (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I apologize if you were upset by the warning messages. I can see how a 'test page' warning might be construed as an accusation of vandalism. But your good faith move effort would not constitute vandalism when viewed against WP:VANDAL. You may want to take a look at the speedy deletion criteria at WP:CSD which will explain what a G2:Test Page nomination is about. Ultimately the article was noticed for redirecting to a non-existent article by the bot and was deleted by an admin per "R1:redirects to non-existent link" (also at WP:CSD). – Zedla (talk) 08:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tricresyl phosphate

Hi there. I removed everything about TCP and airplanes from the TCP article. I know that you contributed to this section so, I apologize if my action offends. These kinds of claims require serious references (books, refereed journals), not blogs and websites. A pretty substantial literature exists on the hazards of TCP. If you can be patient, which could tax your will power, you can be assured that others will add some good references about the risks that concern you. There are plenty of technically minded editors roaming around that do this kind of thing. Cheers and best wishes, --Smokefoot (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the notes. And sorry to question your patience. It is tricky trying to communicate in this way and not come across as surly, etc. Now to my partonizing mode: experience on the Wiki-chem articles shows that people concerned about toxic chemicals tend to be pretty insistent. Unfortunately, these same editors often weaken the very cause they are passionate about because they get impatient (they just "know" there's a problem and sometimes convinced that a conspiracy is afoot), etc. So the chemistry editors, who dont really have an angle to push one way or the other, they just like good sources, are often targeted by outraged defenders of what they "know" to be a "dirty secret." A fairly sure-fire approach to publicizing a particular chemical hazard is to cite a few great sources (not web-stuff) and to keep the wording sober. End of patronizing speech! In any case, I am going to leave the TCP thing alone for the moment, but it is likely that other editors will scrutinize the sources and ask for edits and better sources. Nice talking to you, and happy editing.--Smokefoot (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)