User talk:Angel caboodle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Thanks!

Thanks very much for supporting my RfA. Unfortunately it wasn't a success, however, I appreciate your support all the same! —— Ryan (talk/contribs) 23:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

No problem at all! And if you run again in the future – something I highly suggest – be sure to tell me, and I'll once again give you my support. --Angel caboodle 02:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Degrassi

Sorry about the mixup! :) phoenixMourning (talk) 01:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Ha ha, I was just about to say... I was the one reverting the vandalism. :-P Angel caboodle (talk) 01:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to List of Skins characters has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Unconstructive? I was summarizing the bio of a character that was too long! The previous writer had just written out an episode summary of Episode 2 of Series 2, which is too much information, so I summed up the main points. How is that unconstructive? Angel caboodle (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Barnstar

Thank very much for the barnstar, you're too kind! :) —— Ryan (t)•(c) 08:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem at all! You deserved it! :-) Angel caboodle (talk) 11:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Lucas

Does he need his own article, when there's so little information about him? Many shows don't have pages for each recurring character, including powerhouse shows like SpongeBob. If Degrassi Community School was deleted as non-notable, I really don't think Lucas would stand a chance if he was ever brought up on AfD. The fewer the amount of articles, the safer. -- Zanimum (talk) 00:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

You have a point, but at the same time, his information was previously on the Jane Valieri article, when it shouldn't because they're two separate (although related) characters. I moved the information to a new article, seeing as searching for "Lucas Valieri" just redirected to Jane's article, but if enough people are against this, I have no problem with the article's deletion. :-) - Keng - t | c - 14:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A Barnstar

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
I hereby award you, User:Angel caboodle, The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar because you definitely go that extra mile to show that you care —— Ryan • t | c 14:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank-you! :-) - Keng - t | c - 14:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rollback

Hello Angel caboodle, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Acalamari 17:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank-you!! - Keng - t | c - 17:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome! Acalamari 17:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks very much for the Barnstar! :) —— Ryan • t | c 21:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem at all, sir! You well deserved it!! :-D - Keng - t | c - 21:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Blekinge Street Gang

I just rolled back your edit to this article, as it looked like a vandalism with a bogus edit summary. Upon further examination, it appears that in doing some spelling corrections, you inadvertently removed an entire lengthy subsection. I hope you will continue to do spelling corrections, and wanted to clarify that no ill-will was intended here. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh my, thanks for letting me know! I don't know how I could have done that!! I'll fix the spelling of those words without removing a section haha. - Keng - t | c - 14:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Good work

Well done on your work on List of serial killers by number of victims:) It needed someone to finally take it seriously! I have a question though: what's your position on the inclusion of someone like Dr John Bodkin Adams? Another editor in the past has opposed my attempt to include him here, saying that he was acquitted (which is true). Basically... Adams was tried in 1957 in the UK but the trial seems to have been deliberately lost by the prosecution (who didn't want a doctor to hang for the murder of a patient). Police archives suggest he was the likely killer of 163 patients. Do you think he deserves inclusion? I would say yes since critical consensus is that he was guilty, but the other editor says the acquittal overrides everything (despite it being considered doubtful by almost all sources). Bearing in mind the guy died in 1983, BLP hardly applies and I say we should go and include him. What do you think since you seem to have your head screwed on right (unusual for the people editing the serial killer list;) )? Thanks. Malick78 (talk) 17:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Well from the information you've given me, in my opinion that name should be added. Even though he wasn't found guilty of the murders, there was reason to believe (by police and otherwise) that he was responsible, and thus should be included in the article (just as Moninder Singh Pandher was, who at this point in time, still has a "proven victims" figure of 0). - k|e|n|g - t | c - 17:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay, then I'll add him again soon and if someone objects maybe they will listen to your view if not mine:) Thanks. Malick78 (talk) 12:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hi Angel

Sorry, I'll fix the article, so it meets the the rules of sources.

Thanks for the information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capitalist Shrugged (talk • contribs) 17:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Manny Santos

If the vandalism (and that includes made up, irrelevant, or clearly erroneous edits) please consider filing a vandalism report at WP:AIV or let me know and I will do it for you. – ukexpat (talk) 18:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I see it has persisted, I will file an AIV report. – ukexpat (talk) 18:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay then. I had assumed good faith (perhaps the user was just new to editing, or maybe their additions were mere speculation that must be removed), but obviously the problem has escalated lol. Thanks. - k|e|n|g - t | c - 18:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP:ENGVAR

Well done for your good work on fixing spelling errors. Remember though that on an article about a UK-based subject like The Verve, we use UK English spelling conventions, like "travelling". Best wishes, --John (talk) 05:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh... sorry, my bad. I'm Canadian and was always taught that it was spelt "traveling"... but then again, Canadian spelling is kind of a mixture between American and British. Sorry about that! :-P - k|e|n|g - t | c - 05:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
No problem. I was brought up in Scotland and now live in the US so I am very aware of these things. Keep up the good work, --John (talk) 05:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikify Wikiproject

Hi there! Thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify. We're currently recruiting help to clear a massive backlog (14,000+ articles), and we need your help! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends.

——Ryan | t • c 13:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! That looks like my kind of project!! - k|e|n|g - t | c - 14:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)