Talk:Angelica Sin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
2006-07-14t02:51:25z/2006-07-17t00:05:20z archive. -- Jeandré, 2006-07-25t18:55z
I just want to point out that in one of the interviews there was this mentioned:
- "She also tells the story about having a stalker who apparently was writing terrible things about her on the Internet, but I'll have to get the full details for another time."[1]
So there's that as a bit of background. Tabercil 12:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Real name / "Moochers"
To the would-be editor who keeps adding Angelica's "real" name and additional information: I strongly urge you to read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, which is the official policy of Wikipedia. To quote from it:
- "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just highly questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles,[2] talk pages, user pages, and project space." (emphasis original)
Your edits are in clear violation of this policy as you are introducing statements that would indicate that Angelica was convicted of felony charges. It does not matter if you are right and that Angelica is all that you say; Wikipedia's policy on this is clear and air-tight. As Jimbo Wales once said:
- I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.
And who is Jimbo Wales? The founder and lead architect of Wikipedia. What he says is law here, and he is being very clear on this topic.
If you are going to add the information, you must provide a reliable source. The onus is on you to back it up with clear and incontrovertible proof: from later on in WP:BLP "The burden of evidence for any edit on Wikipedia, but especially for edits about living persons, rests firmly on the shoulders of the person who adds or restores the material." (emphasis added)
Do not wave your arms and say "it's there". You must with specificity point to precisely where the information to back up each and every one of your edits can be found. Anything less, per Jimbo, must be removed immediately.
Additionally, I also strongly urge you to read the official policy regarding no personal attacks against other users. Statements such as "Fuck you, you little bitch. You a fucking pussy hiding behind your keyboard in your mommy's basement" clearly violate this policy and do not help you in making your case. We have banned users for such conduct, even if their edits were right and proper. Tabercil 22:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Are her boobs natural or implants?
anyone know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.209.159 (talk) 23:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
