User talk:Andypp123
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] May 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Adolf Hitler. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 12:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Justin Angra
Enough, if you recreate that you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edge
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Adam Copeland, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Darrenhusted 20:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to American Revolution. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to American Revolution, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Phil McGraw, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Seti has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Astral (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to SETI, you will be blocked from editing. Gamaliel (talk) 18:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of End all apathy
A tag has been placed on End all apathy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.