User talk:Andyhartman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Dan sanders.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dan sanders.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Andyhartman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 16:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Andy,
It may be that your book does not meet the notability requirements for books. Please review it.

Within Wikipedia, Notability is an article inclusion criterion based on encyclopedic suitability. The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice". This concept is distinct from "fame", "importance", or "popularity". A subject is presumed to be sufficiently notable if it meets the general notability guideline, or if it meets an accepted subject-specific standard.

Thanks again for your efforts, and welcome to Wikipedia! - CobaltBlueTony 15:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Built to Serve

It's regretable that you feel as you do. Please note that calling people wikibullies doesn't help. Understand our notability criteria (WP:N) and how they relate to books (WP:BK). Significant coverage by reliable sources (see WP:RS for what that means) is required. Has this book received awards, significant coverage? Is it a best seller? If not, it probably doesn't merit a stand alone article. A mention in its author's biography is usually sufficient - assuming he is sufficiently notable for biographies (WP:BIO). I hope that helps. Carlossuarez46 00:56, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Wikibully

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Wikibully, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Flibbert 01:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RHaworth#Wikibully Anything else? Flibbert 01:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your last message

If it's not retaliatory, then you have nothing to worry about. An admin will simply delete my proposed deletion, tell me why and life will go on. Flibbert 01:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikibully and speedy deletion

A tag has been placed on Wikibully, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Wikibully is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Wikibully saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Flibbert 01:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)