Talk:Andronovo culture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Central Asia Andronovo culture is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang, Tibet and Central Asian portions of Iran and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

In the last edit, the attribute "disputed" has vanished. Is its status not longer disputed? --Pjacobi 21:23, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)

The Dictionary of Archaeology source I used says it's authentic and the link that the original editor included seems to doesn't dispute it so without any evidence to the contrary I deleted away.
Maybe the author meant that certain aspects of the culture or its wider role are disputed and a quick Google seems to imply they are sometimes called in to explain the Ayran invasion theory of India. I like to avoid copying web sources though especially in examples such as that. adamsan 21:55, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The only Andronovo village in Siberia I could find is not in the Enisei basin at all, but much further west (see coordinates). What gives? dab (ᛏ) 15:53, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

I've made a map to the best of my knowledge. It would be nice to show a colour gradient to represent expansion over time, but I don't have detailed sources about that. dab (ᛏ) 16:56, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Evidently this's been superceded, but, I've heard Mesopotamia credited as inventor of spokes. Wrong? Trekphiler 07:53, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] BC to BCE: get with the Zeitgeist!

As this article is neither thematically Christocentric nor theological in tone or Worldview, the inclusive BCE convention has been standardized throughout as has been common in the revisionist bastion of the Ivory Tower for over 30 years.
Walking my talk in Beauty
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 23:53, 4 October 2007 (UTC)