Talk:Andrew Hurst

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrew Hurst article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
Maintenance An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

Hurst has presided as an officer in several organizations, and the fact for some of those groups, there may be unrelated opposition groups that are larger is not relevant. His work is frequently mentioned in the Legal Times for several years since Whitewater, but those pages cannot be linked. This page was deleted in the past but in violation of the deletion policy. Acham 06:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I still fail to see why Andrew Hurst is an important candidate. So he served on the Fairfax County Dem committee, I know around 1,000 spots are on the Fairfax Republican Committee. Also, he hasnt won the primary, he isnt exactly favored to win either. He hasnt presided over any organizations, except serve on ones that hundreds of people have. I fail to see his importance until he wins the primary. This person is clearly a candidate since this page has been deleted in the past.

DTfromDC 00:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] YouTube links

This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)