This article doesnt fit Wikipedia standards . There seems too much personal interpretation over the material presented. Very POV.
I agree. This article is very childish, Non-POV and not grounded i any sort of reality. When a supposed academic /historical article proclaims a publisher to be a magician comes across has backwards and exhibits the worst face of superstitious nonsense. The article needs to be wiped clean and begun again with a bit more grounding.
(edit)