User talk:Ancient Land of Bosoni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some recommended guidelines to help wikipedia newbies get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing newcomer! Ancient Land of Bosoni
Getting started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting help
Getting along
Getting technical


  1. August 2006 – January 2007
  2. February 2007 –


Contents

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Bogumili-tvrtka1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Bogumili-tvrtka1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image source problem with Image:Umjetnicka galerija12.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Umjetnicka galerija12.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image source problem with Image:StecakBosnjacki.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:StecakBosnjacki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Umjetnicko djelo bogumili.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Umjetnicko djelo bogumili.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Images

Even without the tags, they still need a source otherwise they'll just get deleted for having no fair-use rationale. Along with a tag, specify the source or copyright holder information. Provide as much detail as possible. See WP:TAG. -WarthogDemon 01:48, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pictures on Bosniaks page

Hey, I am not a "vandal". Yes, I removed the images. If you wish to see my reasoning, go to the discussion page and read it. King Tvrtko Kotromanic and the stecci tomb stones relate to the history of all three peoples in Bosnia, not just Bosniaks. This is a clear attempt by Bosniaks such as yourself to claim all culture and history in Bosnia as your own. If you wish to place the images anywhere, direct yourself to the Bosnians page. Otherwise, I will continue doing what I've done. I've provided a good reason.

I agree that the steccis and the kotromanic dynasti belong to all three peoples of Bosnia - becasue they all stem from the very same bosnian medieval state. This is covered extensively in the Bosnians article so there is no need to explain it any further. However the important thing here is that Bosniaks have equal rights of claiming these monuments of bosnia as bosnian catholics or orthodox christians do. Ancient Land of Bosoni

[edit] Ethnicity of Bosniaks

Ancient Land of Bosoni, please stop trying to "prove" they are not Slav, as you have failed before you even begin. Ethnicity is all about a shared language, culture and customs - it has nothing to do with genetics. Inserting second rate sources from obscure figures stating that Bosniaks have some "Illyrian blood" doesn't mean they aren't Slavs. Obviously any ethnic group from the balkans is going to have some Illyrian in them, since all the migrants mixed with the indigenous tribes - it's not as if newcomers just exterminated everyone already living there. You don't need to keep trying to "prove" that Bosniaks are a different people than Croats and Serbs; They are different, OK, we get it, we accept it, and we understand it. There is absolutely no need to keep stating that there is some Illyrian blood in them. Greetings from Russia. Frvernchanezzz (talk) 05:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for accepting the compromise man! Cheers! Frvernchanezzz (talk) 06:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

You didn't even read my version, you just reverted it. Please first read it, then comment it on discussion page! The Dragon of Bosnia (talk) 23:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Review

Hi. As you are familiar with the Army of Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Fikret Abdić, The role of foreign fighters in the Bosnian war and 7th Muslim Brigade I ask you to review tha last edits in order to get second opinion. It seems that some users just keep including anti-muslim propaganda by default. I improved those articles, so you can compare it with the version imposed by other user who was blocked because of 3RR. The Dragon of Bosnia (talk) 10:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ivan Kricancic case

Please just take a look here [1] - if you know anything about that feel free to tell me. The Dragon of Bosnia (talk) 21:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bosniaks article

The re-work of the history section i think is good now, although you reverted it becuase you 'don;t beleive' that Serbs and Croats first settled Bosnia. Out of courtesy, i will make an effort to explain to you. I clearly outline, that the proto- Serbs and Croats (ie tribes) settled eastern and wetsern halves roughly, of Bosnia as part of the general Slavic migration which aslo mixed with illyrians, etc. I make the distinction of proto-Serbs, ie not the same entity as modern Serbs. Now this is a fact, its not propaganda or POV. Most books would support this. Check Shepherds historical atlas.

The subsequent short history i included about Bosnia is relevant, as the average reader doesn;t know much about the Yuigoslavs in general, so a background picture is vital to understand the current situation.

I think my summary is fair and neutral. I trust you will put aside your own personal wishes/ views about your background, and respect the sourced views, which are mainstream, rather than drawing up your own theory about some Celtic and Gothic origins. Furthermore, about the Wilkes quote, i intentionally said that it is a postulate, not a conclusion. We cannot prove such things which happened thousands of years ago, but we can certainly make informed, supported theories. Hxseek (talk) 05:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

OK. I reverted your reversion, but on re-consideration, i think u have a point. Yes it is about Bosniaks, and not Bosnian history. i am willing to co-operate with you, though i still affirm that something should be said about the overall background of Bosniaks. The politcal, geographic history of bosnia must be relevant since they lived there and got their name from there. Bosnia's position of independence is intimately linked with the emrgence of a Bosniak people. The reader should know what was there before Bosniaks developed an identity Hxseek (talk) 13:25, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
I shortened the section, got rid of a large chunk about croat and serb kingdoms, etc, making it more relevant, whilst keeping a bit of the background, so a reader whom does not know much about balkan history can understand how the different peoples arose. Hxseek (talk) 01:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bosniaks article (Number 2)

Hello. How's it goin? I noticed your edit on the Bosniaks article yesterday. I have nothing against the content of your edit, but I'm sure those other guys will. But anyway, I like your additions, so I'm not going to revert the edit again, but I'd suggest making a statement on the talk page though. Kind regards. Frvernchanezzz (talk) 07:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for comment Osli73

Hi Ancient. I want to inform you that I am going to start request for comment, if Osli73 continues with the same behaviour. I have now plenty of material, but I will also like you to take a part. Regards. The Dragon of Bosnia (talk) 17:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I am going to present this case very systematically, for example to list his block log, his reverts, other disruptive edits like this. So if you have something to add feel free to do that. Block log:

  • 12:23, 5 December 2007, Stifle blocked Osli73 (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 24 hours ‎ (Three-revert rule violation: Bosnian Mujahideen)
  • 07:45, 24 July 2007 WikiLeon blocked Osli73 (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 month.
  • 07:37, 24 July 2007 WikiLeon blocked Osli73 (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 3 months.
  • 02:26, 23 March 2007 Thatcher131 blocked Osli73 (anon. only, account creation blocked, autoblock disabled) with an expiry time of 2 weeks ‎ (violating revert limit on Srebrenica massacre see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Kosovo)
  • 01:48, 1 March 2007 Jayjg blocked Osli73 (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 2 weeks ‎ (violation of arbcom revert parole on Srebrenica massacre again)
  • 09:48, 18 December 2006 Srikeit blocked Osli73 with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (Sockpuppeteering and directly violating his arbcom probation and revert parole)
  • 00:49, 5 September 2006 Blnguyen blocked Osli73 with an expiry time of 96 hours ‎ (did about 10 reverts on Srebrenica massacre in about 2 hours)

Regards. The Dragon of Bosnia (talk) 17:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Armija BiH.svg

Image:Armija BiH.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)