Talk:Anchor, Shropshire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I removed the pub-stub and cat as it is basically about a village (which happens to have a pub of the same name). I think that if there is enough to write an article about the pub itself it is best to put it into a seperate article - an entry should not if at all possible be about two different things, however simialr the names. I know there are many cases when this is done (eg Guinness is about the company and the drink for example) but it is best to avoid these. Justinc 16:59, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
-
- Why make things complicated? Just leave it as it is - the village and the pub are both called Anchor and unusually in this case it's the village that is named after the pub. If you've ever been to Anchor you will realise that the pub is the oldest part of the village and the small number of other buildings there (it's really quite small) have grown around it. I suggest we leave it as one article, with two sections - one for the settlement and one for the pub. Makes it easier and groups together two closely related things. David 18:10, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- ok, with headings like that it looks better. I'll shut up now. It sounds like a nice place... Justinc 18:57, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Why make things complicated? Just leave it as it is - the village and the pub are both called Anchor and unusually in this case it's the village that is named after the pub. If you've ever been to Anchor you will realise that the pub is the oldest part of the village and the small number of other buildings there (it's really quite small) have grown around it. I suggest we leave it as one article, with two sections - one for the settlement and one for the pub. Makes it easier and groups together two closely related things. David 18:10, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
