Talk:Anadenanthera colubrina
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Where to from here?
Thanks everyone for helping make this article so encyclopedic. Anyone have any ideas what else we can do to improve this article? —oac old american century talk @ 05:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
the articles contain this line at the end of Entheogenic uses. A nearly identical, more potent snuff called yopo. but the page on yopo says. A nearly identical, more potent snuff called vilca. so which one is more potent?
Anadenanthera colubrina is normally about twice as potent. I believe the Anadenanthera colubrina Entheogenic Uses article just was copied and pasted from the original Anadenanthera peregrina article and this line was not fixed for the Anadenanthera colubrina article. Ron Delipski 00:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
The entheogenic uses of both Anadenanthera colubrina and Anadenanthera peregrina are nearly identical. I think rather than having redundant information we should have one reference the other whenever there is purely identical information. What do you think? Ron Delipski 00:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
We need to add some pictures of the beans and of the preparation of the snuff by shamans as well as pictures of it in use.Ron Delipski 00:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)