User talk:Amyyaley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello Amyyaley & Wilkommen! Welkom! Bienvenue! Benvenuti! ようこそ! Välkommen! Witamy! Bem-vindo(a)! ¡Bienvenido! Добро пожаловать! 欢迎! Basically, welcome to Wikipedia!

Български | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Lietuvių | 한국어 | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Português Русский | Suomi | Svenska | Türkçe | 简体中文 | The main embassy page [edit]

Getting Started
Getting help
The Commmunity
Policies and Guidelines
Things to do
Click here to respond to this message!

GtstrickyTalk or C 18:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


See: WP:FAQ/Business and WP:MOVE Cheers. GtstrickyTalk or C 21:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of OC Systems

An article that you have been involved in editing, OC Systems, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OC Systems. Thank you. ju66l3r (talk) 16:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Adenin TECHNOLOGIES

I have nominated Adenin TECHNOLOGIES, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adenin TECHNOLOGIES. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 17:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] OC Systems deletion

The page was deleted and redeleted because of this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OC Systems. If you want to dispute this, you can take it to deletion review. The company is not notable and does not meet our corporation notability guideline. Fram (talk) 06:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Adenin TECHNOLOGIES

A tag has been placed on Adenin TECHNOLOGIES, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 21:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] adenin TECHNOLOGIES

I left a question on the talk page about this citation. Don't I get and answer? Amyyaley (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Adenin TECHNOLOGIES was deleted as it was an advertizement. You can recreate it if you wish but please read WP:COI, WP:NPOV, and WP:BFAQ first. Stifle (talk) 08:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
In response to your question on my talk page, I only nominated Adenin TECHNOLOGIES for speedy deletion: the deletion was performed by Stifle. I don't recall the detail of the page, but please read the various policies Stifle quotes, along with the policy on advertising. I notice that a previous Adenin Technologies page was discussed then deleted: the discussion may be useful to understand the policies, you can read it here. You compared the article with other companies' pages. If you think other companies are advertising on wikipedia you can tag them or nominate for deletion, but please bear in mind that the existence of other articles doesn't necessarily set a precedent. If you want to get the article restored somewhere where you can edit it and make it encylopedic the instructions are above, and I'd be happy to give an opinion on whether it would qualify as an article. Regards TrulyBlue (talk) 10:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I've read the version on your user page. I think you need to show that the awards the company has won are themselves notable and respected: there are so many industry awards these days that almost any company will pick up some awards if it wants to. The rest of the article does not tell me that the company is notable. How many employees does it have? What's the turnover? Has it grown significantly? The phrase "an award given to companies who demonstrate a willingness to listen and serve their customers in useful and innovative ways" seems like peacock words, even if it is the basis on which the award is given. Basically I think you're struggling to show that this company is notable - please read the definition of notability and see if adenin meets it. TrulyBlue (talk) 17:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)