Talk:Amtrak Cascades

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
	This article is within the scope of the Passenger trains task force.

	Oregon Portal This page is part of WikiProject Oregon, a WikiProject dedicated to articles related to the U.S. state of Oregon. To participate: join (or just read up) at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
PSU stuff & Applegate Trail are the current Collaborations of the week.
Start	This page is rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article is rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	Canada Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	British Columbia Portal This article is part of the British Columbia WikiProject (Discuss/Join).

I moved this back to Amtrak Cascades because it seems to always be called that, even in places like [1] where nothing else has Amtrak before. --SPUI (talk) 20:07, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• This is my source for the information as well. If even Amtrak calls it the Amtrak Cascades, they by golly they should know. BobGreenwade 16:46, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• The station personnel refer to the trains as "the Cascades", including in announcements. IMO, this is what they should be called and Amtrak is wrong to put their name where it doesn't belong. "I rode Amtrak's Empire Builder train" sounds OK, "I rode Amtrak's Amtrak Cascades train" doesn't. ...Actually, I wonder if they got the idea from Amtrak California? If so, the thing is that there aren't any trains called the Amtrak Califorina; it is instead a group of train services with their own names.--Jason McHuff 01:23, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Station Stops and schedule

I'd like to come up with a table of station stops and scheduling that indicates how a trainset travels throughout the day - the current list of train numbers isn't very readable. I'm looking for something similar to work from, but having little luck. If someone else has any ideas as to how to do this, please discuss them here.

When Station Stops get an overhaul, I plan to place it nearer to the top again.

Uh, that's a bit too much info. There's no point in having the exact times; it will be less up-to-date than the official site. --SPUI (talk) 10:38, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The official site only shows this information via PDF (which many users can't view, especially from public computers), and it's updated once a year. The schedule I've made will be valid until July of 2006. The current paragraph on station stops is confusing and poorly written.Bensch 14:49, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

While this much is true, it would be a bit much to include here for several reasons: first, to be of equal use to everyone someone would have to do this for every route on the system; second, the times do periodically change in mid-season (twice a year, not annually, by the way); third, the format may likewise not be readable on all computers (though I don't consider that a serious concern here); and fourth, if someone's using a public computer without Adobe Acrobat Reader installed they can still get the full published schedule sent in the mail for free (not to mention that we should wonder why anyone would put up a public-access computer without Acrobat Reader).BobGreenwade 16:25, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I'll just come up with a better paragraph then. Bob, SPUI, any comments on what I've done so far (criticism appreciated, this is the first time I've done any major article edits)? What would you like to see next? I'd like to do a history of the route from 1993 on, but I'm not sure where to put it - if it got its own section, I can see quite a bit of duplication being likely, but it doesn't seem to fit either in the base article or in the partnership section. Any advice? --Bensch 16:39, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The Point Defiance Bypass and Vancouver Rail Project maps are from the Washington State Department of Transportation, a public agency, and can be used. Please note the discussion comments in the Pt. Defiance Bypass image page.--Bensch 23:29, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

From: http://wsdot.wa.gov/privacy.htm: All of the information collected at this site becomes public records that may be subject to inspection and copying by members of the public, unless an exemption in law exists. The provisions of RCW 42.17. 260(1) state that: "Each agency, in accordance with published rules, shall make available for public inspection and copying all public records, unless the record falls within the specific exemptions of subsection (6) of this section [RCW 42.17.260(6)], RCW 42.17.310, 42.17.315, or other statute which exempts or prohibits disclosure of specific information or records. To the extent required to prevent an unreasonable invasion of personal privacy interests protected by RCW 42.17.310 and 42.17.315, an agency shall delete identifying details in a manner consistent with RCW 42.17.310 and 42.17.315 when it makes available or publishes any public record; however, in each case, the justification for the deletion shall be explained fully in writing." --Bensch 23:46, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Public record is a completely separate thing from public domain (copyright). The site says "Copyright WSDOT © 2005" at the bottom. Unless it is released under a suitable license that allows commercial use we cannot use it. --SPUI (talk) 23:47, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Interesting. I've contacted the WSDOT Ombudsman's office. I will get specific permission, how would I indicate that here? --Bensch 23:54, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Specific permission is not enough. Wikipedia is meant for wide distribution in many forms. --SPUI (talk) 00:04, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I've reverted to the version with your image. I'll talk to the WSDOT about releasing their page contents into the public domain (or find case law if such exists), and I'll be more careful about that in the future. By the way, that's a great image you made - how'd you do it? --Bensch 00:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Inkscape is good for making SVGs (though I actually used Macromedia Freehand, then converted to SVG in Adobe Illustrator, then did final editing in Inkscape; I don't know the details of embedding Images in Inkscape). As for the base map, that's from TerraServer-USA. --SPUI (talk) 00:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Actually, I was more curious about where you got the alignment. I'm still waiting on information requests from both WSDOT and Sound Transit on exactly where the connection between the Lakeview subdivision and the Freighthouse Square alignment will be. --Bensch 00:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

I do question whether specific permission is not enough. It looks like there's precedent of that here.

The main argument there is for fair use. The permission is secondary. --SPUI (talk) 00:35, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

I've removed the citation of 623,000 riders in Fiscal 2005, as there is no quoted source and I can't find one. --Bensch

I've added back the 623,000 riders in FY 2005 with a reference. --callmematthew

Please cite Amtrak's funding of one Cascades round trip. --Bensch

Anyone care to discuss problems of Amtrak timekeeping and its causes? --Dampflok (talk) 22:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)