User talk:AmesG

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is AmesG's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to AmesG.

my welcome message from a friend -AmesG 22:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Hoji! We know each other from that place. How nice to see you. I've decided to give up on that project. I hope you'll forgive me; I just couldn't take it anymore. Just to make sure, I blocked it in my HOSTS file ;-).-AmesG 22:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Ahoyhoy again. Not sure if you're a well-versed Wiki user, but if you have questions, I'll try to respond quickly. Leave 'em at the talk page. -Hojimachongtalk 05:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Um...I don't know if this is the right thing to do, posting here. I've never used Wiki before, but I've been following your adventures over at that other place for a while now, and I have a theory about it that may interest you. Should I contact you some other way (email or some other method) or is here fine? Kelseigh 00:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

E-mail me, ames@nyu.edu -AmesG 15:17, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi AmesG, I may be gone from the ol' Conservapedia but I ain't dead! --Ruby 05:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, AmesG, I'd tread lightly asking Roger Schlafly what he has against gays. His mother has been preaching the evilness of gays for some time now, and continued to do so even after she learned that her son John (Roger and Andrew's brother) was gay. There are clearly some family issues being worked out, and it's probably best for you to leave the sleeping dog alone. Since Conservapedia is in essence nothing more than the Schlafly family bulletin board, you can pretty much take "Gays are Evil" as one of the fundamental commandments. - Outerlimits 15:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Schlafly.png

[edit] Conservapedia

I saw the comment you left on Richard Dawkins' talk page, concerning Conservapedia. After I saw the comment I googled "conservapedia"... is this site for real? I mean, just look at this page [1] This shouldn't be considered an encyclopedia...--Orthologist 17:27, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree with you, buddy. What's really scary is that it's being used to teach children. Shocking.-AmesG 20:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi AmesG! Sorry to see that you've been banned by (le gasp!) TK. His banning rampages know no limits. You're an icewedge sock apparently. I'm counting the days before I get banned - basically everyone TK doesn't like have just been banned - have a look here. --Wikinterpreter

[edit] Trustworthy Encyclopedia

I have been following the recent events at Conservapedia and think that you being infinitely banned in a the Stalinist purge is sad. All I saw you do was stand up for the little oppressed guys, which is admirable. It shows that the Sysops are fascists, because they silenced your attempts to rectify injustices. Who do i go to assist in combating this attempt by the nazis to return us to the dark ages? Phirephinch 05:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:RationalWiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RationalWiki.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)