Talk:American Woodmark
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. |
| B | rated as b-Class on the assessment scale |
| Mid | rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale |
I think a more comprehensive listing of the product line is necessary, but how much more? There are only a few styles of doors, a few types of wood, and about a dozen colors (also note that not every door comes in every color). Should there be a complete listing, or just something that lists every door style, color and species available? Your thoughts? Pandemic 10:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Yeah that was also me that had contributed as "24.121.136.232". Guess my cookie got reset.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AWC 2007 new.jpg
Image:AWC 2007 new.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Wow, I'm so glad to see that people are caring about the content of articles as opposed to meaningless things. Pandemic (talk) 12:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
