Talk:Ambrosini SAI.207

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

575kmh or 630kmh speed? However, pilots weren't so happuy as the agility of this fighter, nor the structure, better for a racer aircraft, was satisfactory as well.--80.104.204.98 09:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Who knows? Moreover, the S.403 was even more controvertial: how can be faster than S.207 with the same engine and 200 kg more, not to talk about aerodynamic, less versed in speed and more as agility (bigger wings, more drag)? There are values of 650 kmh, simply out of the realm of reality, but also 560 km/h, well more reliable but still, a bit low to justify the entusiam and order 3000 machines. In every cases, something is not clear. I don't think that S.207 was faster than C.202 or S.403 to C.205, that had twice hp.--Stefanomencarelli 20:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)