Talk:Ambiguity tolerance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ambiguity tolerance article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is part of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of education and education-related topics. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to featured and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.
Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Article

I am thinking of starting a new article on Ambiguity and Theology or Ambiguity and Faith - a live issue for many Christians, for example, who are migrating out of Fundamentalism.

Any ideas/suggestions/problems with this? Ron Cameron 10:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Ron Cameron

There's the issue of self-reference - is the article itself going to be ambiguous and amorphous? That is, can we pin down this subject and produce hard, or is it just going to be anecdotal? I must admit, I'm a bit sceptical. On the other hand, I'd be interested to see what you come up with. StAnselm 06:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)