Talk:Amber Diceless Roleplaying Game
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Role-playing games, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. |
An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Amber_Diceless_Roleplaying_Game article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.
Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add {{User:LinkBot/suggestions/Amber_Diceless_Roleplaying_Game}} to this page. — LinkBot 01:03, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Conflict Resolution section
Suggest removing the link to Dogs in the Vineyard in the Conflict section. ADRP conflict resolution is really not much like DITV conflict resolution.
Vaxalon 16:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] System topics
System descriptions are interrupted mid-way through to insert analysis bits about Psyche in Amber DRPG compared to the Chronicles. Can game design analysis have it's own section separate from explaining the system? Can all attributes be compared to the books in addition to Psyche? This is certainly an area discussed elsewhere on the web (perhaps the best being http://wso.williams.edu/~msulliva/campaigns/amber/tips/). Arref 23:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say that a sub-section looking at one of the attributes was an interruption to the attributes section; and I don't think that analysis of the system should be separated from explanation of it; what would be left would be against the no game guides guideline. However, analysis of the other powers would be appropriate (though I doubt there's as much to say about them) and the site you point out does seem to provide some useful references (for example, on the Corwin Cycle vs. Merlin Cycle canon issues). Percy Snoodle 11:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
