User talk:Alzuun
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] License tagging for Image:Xplusyequals4.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Xplusyequals4.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thanks for your addition to Shameless. At Wikipedia, each normal article is about a single topic. When other topics have the same name, the guideline on disambiguation generally applies. Hope that helps, William Pietri 19:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Dorn D'vinn
A tag has been placed on Dorn D'vinn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 17:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- The article was already deleted. If you're not ready to place your article for review, please keep your work in your Sandbox until it is completely ready for review. Short articles with little facts or contain only a couple of sentence without proper notability are generally nominated for speedy deletion. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 17:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- Wow, you're complaining to me now? 13 days after I replied? It is up to any editor on Wikipedia to consider whether an article is within reason to post as speedy deletion. Since I was not the person who actually deleted the article, only the person who suggested to have the article deleted, please do not gripe on my talk page telling me how I should or should not contribute to Wikipedia. If you have further questions, please contact the administrator responsible for deleting your article. Please also note: If you have problems with other people editing or deleting your material, don't post it. I didn't come up with that either. It's one of Wikipedia's many policies. I suggest you read up. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 19:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Production Issues
A tag has been placed on Production Issues requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Production Issues
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Production Issues, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Implementation Issues
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Implementation Issues, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Implementation Issues. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Baggage(Children)
A tag has been placed on Baggage(Children), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Note: You may wish to read some of this site's tutorials since you appear to be unlear as to how to contribute here. Thanks.
- Please do not remove deletion notices and please do not insert your point-of-view into any article. Again, may I respectfully suggest that you read the tutorials? Thanks again. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. I don't mean to be nasty, but reposting deleted content is viewed as severe vandalism. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] lol
Love your User Page.Did you come up with it?Mr. Greenchat 16:44, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] We need to talk
about your deleting pages.You should ask before you do that.I am sure your intentions are good but you still should just mark it and move on.Mr. Greenchat 17:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Suggestions
Hi there. I see you've tried to submit a number of articles that have not been considered acceptable for the encyclopedia; sorry for that, but we do have a set of guidelines and regulations that determine what can and cannot be included in Wikipedia. I see you haven't had a welcome message left for you; I'll do that after this message to give you some useful links and information that can help you develop as a productive editor here.
The most important consideration for Wikipedia is that articles are verifiable, where that verification comes from reliable sources - magazines, newspapers, books, and reputable scholarly sources are all good sources, as are some websites - depending on whether they have editorial oversight or not. Notability is the basis by which we determine whether a topic is worthy of an article here; there are a bunch of subsets of notability that you can find off that page to learn how each one is decided on.
I hope you're not too put off by the articles you've come up with being deleted. Please take a look through these links, as well as the ones following; I'd suggest reading lots of other Wiki articles as well to get an idea on how to format and develop them. Get involved in improving existing articles, and you'll learn how to be a good editor in no time, I'm sure. Cheers! Tony Fox (arf!) 19:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
|
