Talk:ALUPEC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ALUPEC article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Africa Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Africa, which collaborates on articles related to Africa in Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Controversy

There are several parts of this article (ALUPEC) that are controversial (please see portuguese version)

The discussion in the Portuguese version is not settled yet. Please, do not make edits if an agreement has not been reached. There is no need to bring the Portuguese discussion into the English page. Ten Islands 21:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

cv_ilidio@yahoo.com:

Yesterday I inserted some corrections concerning ALUPEC. Someone erased it. As you may see details in the "discussion" of the portuguese version – this article has some mistakes concerning ALUPEC: i) until now the Government did nothing to implement the law – ALUPEC; ii) as of today yet the vast majority of Capeverdeans does not know that ALUPEC exists; iii) it is a non-sense to say that someone rejected something that he did not know; iv) the author of the article is campaigning against a Government law using Wikipedia. I hope the Wikipedia’s Administration will take note of this remark. Therefore, I shall insert the truth again: were stays “the majority rejected” or “the majority did not accepted” should stay “as of today, the majority of Creole speakers still writes as before the enactment of ALUPEC”. That is the fact that can be verified. The author shall not invent the reason in the Wikipedia, for here is not the place for fabrication…

30th July, 2007; 1734 Cape Verde's time cv_ilidio@yahoo.com

---

I’ve made some changes to avoid future controversy and edition wars about the number of ALUPEC users. For further information check discussion page (in Portuguese). Ten Islands 15:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)