Alternatives to animal testing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Animal testing

Main articles
Animal testing
Alternatives to animal testing
Testing on: invertebrates ·
Frogs · Primates · Rabbits · Rodents
Animal testing regulations
History of animal testing
History of model organisms
IACUC
Laboratory animal sources
Pain and suffering in lab animals
Testing cosmetics on animals
Toxicology testing

Issues
Biomedical Research
Animal rights/Animal welfare
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act
Great ape research ban
International trade in primates

Controversial experiments
Britches · Brown Dog affair
Cambridge University primates
Pit of despair
Silver Spring monkeys
Unnecessary Fuss

Companies
Charles River Laboratories, Inc.
Covance · Harlan
Huntingdon Life Sciences
UK lab animal suppliers
Nafovanny · Shamrock

Groups/campaigns
Americans for Medical Progress
AALAS · AAAS
Boyd Group · BUAV
Dr Hadwen Trust · PETA
Foundation For Biomedical Research
National Anti-Vivisection Society
Physicians Committee
for Responsible Medicine

Primate Freedom Project
Pro-Test · SPEAK
Research Defence Society
Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty

Writers/activists
Colin Blakemore · Carl Cohen
Gill Langley · Ingrid Newkirk
Neal Barnard · Jerry Vlasak
Simon Festing · Tipu Aziz

Categories
Animal testing · Animal rights
Animal welfare

Related templates
Template:Animal rights

This box: view  talk  edit

Most scientists and governments say they agree that animal testing should cause as little suffering as possible, and that alternatives to animal testing need to be developed. The "three Rs",[1] first described by Russell and Burch (1959), are guiding principles for the use of animals in research in many countries:

  • Reduction refers to methods that enable researchers to obtain comparable levels of information from fewer animals, or to obtain more information from the same number of animals.
  • Refinement refers to methods that alleviate or minimize potential pain, suffering or distress, and enhance animal welfare for the animals still used.
  • Replacement refers to the preferred use of non-animal methods over animal methods whenever it is possible to achieve the same scientific aim.

Contents

[edit] Examples

The two major alternatives to in vivo animal testing are in vitro cell culture techniques and in silico computer simulation. However, some claim they are not true alternatives since simulations use data from prior animal experiments and cultured cells often require animal derived products, such as serum. Others say that they cannot replace animals completely as they are unlikely to ever provide enough information about the complex interactions of living systems.[2] Examples of computer simulations available include models of diabetes,[3] asthma,[4] and drug absorption, though potential new medicines identified using these techniques are currently still required to be verified in animal tests before licensing.

Cell culture is currently the most successful, and promising, alternative to animal use. For example, cultured cells have also been developed to create monoclonal antibodies, prior to this production required animals to undergo a procedure likely to cause pain and distress.[5]

A third alternative now attracting considerable interest is so-called microdosing, in which the basic behaviour of drugs is assessed using human volunteers receiving doses well below those expected to produce whole-body effects.[6]

[edit] Institutes

Institutes researching (and organizations funding) alternatives to animal testing include:

In October 2006 the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) launched an online database of toxicology non-animal alternative test methods. Categories at present include in vitro methods, QSAR models and a bibliographic section.[7]

Under the Framework Programmes 6 and 7, the European Commission is funding (and will be funding) a significant number of large integrated research projects aiming to develop alternatives to animal testing.

[edit] Medical education without animal experimentation

There are efforts underway in many countries to find alternatives to animal testing for education.[8] Horst Spielmann, German director of the Central Office for Collecting and Assessing Altrnatives to Animal Experimentation (ZEBET), while describing Germany's progress in this area, told German broadcaster ARD in 2005:[9]

Using animals in teaching curricula is already superfluous. In many countries, one can become a doctor, vet or biologist without ever having performed an experiment on an animal.

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Russell, W.M.S. and Burch, R.L.. The Removal of Inhumanity: The Three R's. Retrieved on 2007-05-24.
  2. ^ Lipinski, Christopher (16 December 2004). "Navigating chemical space for biology and medicine". Nature 432 (7019): 855–61. doi:10.1038/nature03193. 
  3. ^ Diabetes. entelos.com. Retrieved on 2007-10-05. (from internet archive)
  4. ^ Asthma. entelos.com. Retrieved on 2007-10-05. (from internet archive)
  5. ^ Special section: Monoclonal antibodies. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School ofPublic Health. Retrieved on 2007-09-20.
  6. ^ Malcolm Rowland (February 2006). Microdosing and the 3Rs. National Center for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research ( NC3Rs ). Retrieved on 2007-09-22.
  7. ^ Home page. Evcam Database Service on Alternative methods toAnimal Experimentation. Retrieved on 2007-10-05.
  8. ^ Dalal, Rooshin et al. Replacement Alternatives in Education: Animal-Free''' Teaching abstract from Fifth World Congress on Alternatives and |}Animal Use in the Life Sciences, Berlin, August 2005.
  9. ^ Seeking an End to Animal Experimentation, Deutsche Welle, August 23, 2005, retrieved on December 16, 2007

[edit] External links

Go3R: semantic search to avoid animal experiments