User talk:Allgamenab

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lucas Joseph may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. For further information see Wikipedia:Notability (music). --Fang Aili 17:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Please don't delete a speedy delete tag. Doing so is considered vandalism. If you really think Lucas Joseph is notable, follow the instructions on the page. Thanks. --Fang Aili 17:54, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I nominated Lucas Joseph for deletion to give you an opportunity to argue his notability. CONTINUING to delete speedy tags and AfD tags is considered vandalism, and you WILL be blocked if you continue to do so. --Fang Aili 18:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Notability

Hi Allgamenab. Wikipedia isn't about promotion, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. As such, all article subject matter must be encyclopedic. Wikipedia has guidelines for what is or is not encyclopedic concerning music: Wikipedia:Notability (music). This is the standard that we have to follow. As such, Lucas Joseph and Nicholas Ballasy don't qualify as notable. Good luck with the music, and do come back when those people are notable (or write about something else)! Cheers. --Fang Aili 18:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 21:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Nicole_head_shot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole_head_shot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Cheyenneweb.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cheyenneweb.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Images

Please note that Wikipedia is not your personal website. Removing an official image of George W. Bush to insert an image simply because you are in the image is completely unacceptable. You also are failing to provide licensing and copyright information of the image page for some of your images. Let me suggest that you put any image that you wish to replace an existing image on the talk page of the article and get the reaction before unilaterally deciding that it's OK just because you're in the photo. If you continue this type of editing, you may be blocked. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 16:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

You did it again on Hillary Rodham Clinton. STOP IT. This is now considered vandalism. If you do this again you will be blocked. Ward3001 (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hillary Rodham Clinton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 16:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)