User talk:Alice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alice is rather busy in real life and is taking an erratic wikibreak after her new user account
was approved on 9 December 2007 (Previously, her user name was "Alice.S".)
If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply
on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.

Image:Bouncywikilogo.gif

This user has been loved!
This user has been loved!
This user is straight
but not narrow.
This user loves Singapore.

Alice's ("missing") 'user page'
My last 500 contributions
My Edit Count

"I am running out of patience for incivility at Wikipedia,... Some people simply should not be contributing to an encyclopedia.... and note that all editors should always endeavor to treat each other with kindness, or else find another hobby. When we put up with this kind of behavior, we enable a hostile environment that drives away good people. We should be gentle, but firm: this kind of behavior is not allowed at Wikipedia." --Jimbo Wales 21:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC) [1]

I don't like breaking up conversations.
If I start a conversation on your talk page, I'm watching that
for at least 5 days - so please leave responses on your talk page.
If you start a conversation here, I'll reply here - so make sure you watch this page. Thanks.

Any article I have contributed to recently will also be on my watchlist.

Welcome to Alice's talk page!
The Status Bot has been blocked.
See my last edit here.
  • Please sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~).
  • Please add all new threads at the bottom of the appropriate division; either P or non-P.
  • Please note that I do not respond to every comment. I only respond to the comments I feel I need to respond to.
  • Personal attacks, uncivil comments, and comments which don't follow the conventions of this box may be either immediately archived or removed.
  • Please post comments relating to the contents of our articles on the relevant page's discussion page, and not here. That way all interested parties (including you and I) can participate and reach consensus. (All articles I edit are automatically added to my Watchlist).


Perspicacite comments go in the "P Section"; all other comments: (+)


Contents
Archive
Archives
"The chief difficulty Alice found at first was in managing her flamingo"
"The chief difficulty Alice found at first was in managing her flamingo"


[edit] P section

This "P Section" is for posts by, (or that have a strong link to the conduct of,) User: Perspicacite alias Jose João (P).

One of the reasons for this division was the sheer volume of templated messages and text dumps from P - measuring up to 105,077 bytes in one message! - but these have now been archived since he seems to have found new protagonists.

If one did not assume good faith, one would assume he was attempting to drown out normal dialogue on this, my user talk page since, unless in extremis, I don't usually instantly expunge unfavourable comments (as P does on his own talk page and now even on article discussion pages ).

Please note that I have no desire to get this prolific, erudite and intelligent editor banned (unlike his own stance towards me)(Update: This attack page has now been deleted by an admin). I merely wish him to change his behaviour
and act in a more collegial manner towards his fellow editors

by ceasing to label

a) anyone that edits an article that he previously edited a stalker

and

b) anyone that changes his version a vandal and his contributions vandalism

to be reverted on sight by him without regard to the content or merit of the specific edit.

[edit] Long Time No See

Hello Frank how are you long time no see-- BigDunc (talk) 09:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

While it should go without saying, Frank you and your Socks I want to keep away from my talk page. I assumed good faith and remained civil dispite your allagations. I was willing to accept any sanctions handed down by the ArbCom, but you ran away when questions started to be asked, and created a Sock. Now why don't you present yourself to the ArbCom, using your real account, and answer the allagations you made against me regarding WP:COI and the other Editors you labled as such. And yes, I do now consider it a personal attack. --Domer48 (talk) 18:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Will probably run away again instead of facing the music like he did after arbcom. BigDunc (talk) 18:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Per the revelation that you have been utilizing this sockpuppet to avoid scrutiny, while continuing what landed your old account in hot water, I have blocked this account indefinitely. W. Frank remains unblocked, for you to resume use if you wish. If you would prefer it the other way around, please say so, but continuing in violation of the sockpuppetry policy is not acceptable. Picaroon (t) 01:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding a topic ban on Coloane

Greetings. After the ANI discussion, User:Orderinchaos imposed a ban without a specific limit ([2]). He said it was a more sensbile approach. But I complained that it was blantly not the consensus; he should have raised that point before, but not after the discussion and apparently "hijacked" the consensus ([3][4]). I don't want to appear to be unreasonable and I hope you'll give us some third party opinions. Thank you for your time. Josuechan (talk) 08:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adoption

For adoption, I suggest you see Master of Puppets. Cheers, Basketballone10 00:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

If you've got anything to say, please do so on my talk page. Cheers again, Basketballone10 00:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Delegable proxy

Please see Wikipedia:Delegable proxy... we are trying to get this proposal into a shape suitable for consensus... Thanks, 71.63.91.68 (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)