Talk:Alfred Lilienthal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

no indication that this indication is notable. he looks like a extremist or crank.Thomas Babbington (talk) 01:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Thomas Babbington

the article is not well-organized, but it contains valuable information, and both praise and criticism of Lilienthal, albeit , most people dolt welcome praise form David Duke.

Addhoc: If you want to add more positive material or organize the page, that is acceptable. But it is irresponsible to simply cut out sourced information. Roger Warren (talk) 20:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC) Roger Warren

This article is extremely derogatory and biased against the aged living subject, a former US soldier and diplomat. Removed some of the problems, slurs and falsehoods; more remain. Next to no biographical info, easily available. "Support" only from extremists, in order to paint subject as an extremist or racist. Will continue to neutralize.John Z (talk) 10:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)