User talk:Alexlayer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
| Archive 1 |
Contents |
[edit] So...
Well, archived everything so far.
[edit] Shego
Alex, you changed alot on Shego's page. Could you quickly explain your changes? I almost undid them because it was so drastic. I've undid changes before that were 500kb or more, so I think some kind of quick explanation is in order... --=CJK= 13:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm satisfied. Was it you who nominated Shego for an A class article? --=CJK= 22:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, it was me, although it was for the Good Article class. After so much work, I thougth it would be ready for the that, and if it wasn't, at least someone would tell us what it was missing. Well, the second was the case... and now it's what I'm searching for, though I feel it'll be hard. --Alexlayer 23:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
That was a good idea. What clues do you have for finding out what we need? --=CJK= 23:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- None so far, but I'll be looking.--Alexlayer 00:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
You know this already, but if you find anything, maybe add it to the actual article (external links) not just the talk page? --=CJK= 22:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'll add whatever I find when I find something. So far, I'm not having any luck --Alexlayer 22:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey: about that reverted bit in Shego::appearance-- okay, that was mine, I forgot to sign in-- I thought that bit about attractiveness was well-justified, objective-- and really obvious! It's certainly well-documented: Shego is called pretty by quite a few characters during the run of the series.
Furthermore, it begs the question about how any character appears in animation. The lines are simplified and idealized, eyes and head indicia are increased, etc. In short, every "normal" looking character tends to be attractive! The clues are in the dialog, which is the only way characters can express such subtle aesthetics in a line-drawn universe. These clues are evident: I didn't just write it in because I think Shego is cute.
Request for reconsideration is hereby given. Believe me: I honestly didn't want to wade into Shego until my ducks were lined up. Sbgdcom 01:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Apropos "History:" I know what you're trying to get at, but it's coming out really rough. Tell ya what: just get everything down, and I'll go over it. BTW, the Drakken cut in this section was quite astute, but that bit should go back in the "Drakken" section. It's good character reveal. Sbgdcom 05:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- All right. Just give me some time. I'll try to make some small adjustment first.--Alexlayer 01:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks Alex
Alex, two questions:
- How do we get Shego rated on the importance scale?
- Not sure yet, but I'll try to find out.
- And, more for myself, how do you archive things?
- Check here.
--=CJK= 20:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lilo and Stitch characters
Even if certain characters appeared in a crossover, they can still be considered Lilo and Stitch characters for just being in the series once, they can still be considered "Lilo and Stitch" characters. Unknown Dragon 23:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Centralized TV Episode Discussion
Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Shego
I have re-redirected this article to List of characters in Kim Possible per the consensus established in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wade Load. It has been less than a month since the close of the discussion and I do not think you should be unilaterally reversing the closers decision without further discussion. Guest9999 (talk) 04:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- I told you, many pointed out the importance of those characters that ARE notable because of being of the four more important ones to the show. There was no consensus establishment, but those who mentioned that were practically ignored. Shego's article was fine as it was, it was the most taken care of, and Drakken's need to be re-writen. I'm not questioning that most of the articles did deserve to be merged into one or two articles, but there were these two that shouldn't. --Alexlayer (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about the delay in response but regardless of your opinion you should not unilaterally overturn the outcome of an AfD - especially when there is noted opposition to the action. The closing administrator thought there was a consensus within the community to merge the article, your opinion carries no more weight than theirs. If you feel that the closing admin acted inappropriately you should bring it up with them, or if you feel it is necessary at the administrators notice board, alternately you could start a new discussion about resplitting the article on the talk page of List of characters in Kim Possible, the guidelines set out in WP:NN and WP:FICT may also be of interest. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ebony & Ivory.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Ebony & Ivory.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leon Kennedy (RE2).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Leon Kennedy (RE2).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:DMCLogoAnime.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DMCLogoAnime.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
The following images also have this problem:
- Image:Dante Anime.jpg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
