User talk:Alexander Mak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

edit-warring on Skopje

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 23:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "why im i been blocked?"

Decline reason: "The reason given for you blocking was for edit warring a the article Skopje, it will expire 24 hours after it was placed. — ((1 == 2) ? (('Stop') : ('Go')) 03:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "why im i been blocked?"

Decline reason: "No reason to unblock has been stated. — Raymond Arritt 02:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

No reason for blocking has been stated either.

[edit] Blocked again

I've blocked you again, since you have immediately renewed the same lame revert-war on Skopje, both with this account and your IP (which also has several previous blocks for the same reason). Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


Do you actually read any of my posts? Future Perfect at Sunrise? I -can- easily change IP, but, is there a sense to all this? If so many people protest, it means that there is somthing mor than just a "lame revert-war on Skopje" you as wiki moderator should know this best Fut.Perf... And what kind of moderator has -no- email ??? Alexander Makedon 13:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Huh? My e-mail is activated. Yours isn't. If you want to contact me, go to "My preferences", enter your own e-mail, follow the usual confirmation e-mail, then go here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

O.o who made you a moderator? Wiki is this man in the right place? I have an e-mail active, i have had it for a wile... O.o i have even posted things to other moderators... i mean really are you in the right place?

Sorry, check yours again. Mine is functional; other people have mailed me just today. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Alexander Mak for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --   Avg    23:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


Per this SSP case, you've been blocked 48 hours and Alex Makedon indef. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Editing the same articles with your new account, beginning only two minutes after you abandoned your old account, does not meet the "clean start" criteria at WP:SOCK. Your new account will remain blocked indefinitely, you must use this account (Alexander Mak) to edit Wikipedia. LyrlTalk C 22:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)