User talk:Ale jrb/Archives/March 2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Reverting vandalism

Hey there. Be sure you don't revert to a bad version as you did on predation. Cheers. Richard001 (talk) 20:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

VP bugfix

Hi, thanks a lot for fixing VandalProof. My only question ow is, where do I find the 1.3.8 bugfix release? At least, I didn't find it on the FTP server yet --Mbimmler (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

It isn't uploaded yet - it required clearance from Daniel. Ale_Jrbtalk 21:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I'll check back in a few days. Thanks! --Mbimmler (talk) 21:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
quick question, why did you re-enable VP? I disabled it until this bugfix has been released. βcommand 21:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
It is currently disabled using the versioning system; 1.37(61) should not be working. Please let me know if it is. Ale_Jrbtalk 21:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

VP

Amidaniel says: "[C]ommit the src code to the repo or email it to me If [you]'d like to build and release, [you] can be my guest" on IRC. Hopefully that answers your question. Prodego talk 04:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

New Message

Hello, Ale jrb/Archives. You have new messages at Addshore's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} template.

·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 07:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Al Sharpton

Hello. I was wondering why you described User:Jkaharper's addition of Al Sharpton to Category:Supporters of gay marriage as vandalism?

According to Al Sharpton#Gay rights, Sharpton supports gay marriage. Why is it vandalism to add him to a category of people who share the same view? — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 23:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I apologise if I am wrong, however you should understand that repeatedly and quickly adding multiple, unrelated people to a category that is very open for use in vandalism in a short space of time, with no explanation of ones actions, appears like a vandal edit - especially when watching recent changes. If it is correct, feel free to re-add it. Ale_Jrbtalk 16:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 10 3 March 2008 About the Signpost

Wales' relationship, breakup with journalist Rachel Marsden raises questions about possible improprieties Eleven users apply for bureaucratship 
Signpost interview: Domas Mituzas Role of hidden categories under discussion 
Book review: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Military history WikiProject elections conclude, nine elected 
Best of WikiWorld: "Extreme ironing" News and notes: Encyclopedia of Life, Wikipedian dies, milestones 
Dispatches: April Fools mainpage featured article WikiProject Report: Football 
Tutorial: How to use an ImageMap Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Frickin' awesome

I've been waiting for VP since...since...well, I don't know. But thanks! Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 22:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008

The March 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --15:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Um, 90% of the edits on that page are unconstructive. I'm sure it will all be sorted out eventually, but in the mean time, kindly butt out. Thanks! :)

Christian X of Denmark

heh, we have both somewhat reverted unproductively here ;-) Additional apologies for posting a warning on your talkpage, I am getting tired... --Mbimmler (talk) 22:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Yep, you could say that again ;). And no worries - it happens to everyone! Ale_Jrbtalk 22:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Critical-Mass.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Critical-Mass.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 11:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

VandalProof Authorization

You recently authorized me for VandalProof, but I still can't access it. Calvin 1998 Talk Contribs 19:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

What error message do you get? Ale_Jrbtalk 21:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I found the problem. On Windows Vista, you must run VP "as an administrator". However, I still can't figure out how to change the VP recent patrol preferences as specified in the help manual. Calvin 1998 Talk Contribs 21:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Those settings only work if you are viewing the RSS recent changes mode, and that's a little buggy. It's up to you, though. You can change the feed in the file menu, under feeds. Ale_Jrbtalk 22:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

VandalProof

Hey - I never actually got to use my 20 minutes' or so of access :-) As I said in my application, please contact the admin Dweller to verify my reformedness since then. Please. Thanks. —TreasuryTag talk contribs 07:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Per my post at AN on Feb 28th about this user (formerly User:Porcupine) I can vouch for him, as I mentored him following his blocks. I've rarely (never?) seen an editor reform so well.--Dweller (talk) 10:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, please contact the more senior VP mod User:Betacommand with regard to this issue. Thanks! Ale_Jrbtalk 21:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Done. I've pointed him to this discussion. --Dweller (talk) 11:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
At this current time I am unable to approve this user. Given the long history of disruption, I am unwilling to let such a short time counter the history that this user has, come june, without incident I will gladly re-consider. βcommand 15:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
NoNDeny. I have to concur with User:Betacommand due to insufficient mitigating evidence. We at Wikipedia have so many problems with unregistered-user tampering, that we dare not suffer complications from within our own WikiProject Council. Recommend continue the case of User:TreasuryTag to June per User:Betacommand. B. C. Schmerker (talk) 09:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Good Day

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster%2C_The_Reformed_Church_of

The parody religion is OK, but the Reformation of the parody is not? Of all the junk and misinformation on Wiki, this falls below the line?

If you can think of a better way to annoy Allen Thicke as he shops and grieves, then be my guest. Otherwise, let us grow in peace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ReformedFSM (talkcontribs) 18:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

hey!

Hey, I am the user that created Jaguar R5. Please don't delete it, as it is needed to complete the list of Jaguar F1 cars, and I feel it could be expanded, and not just chucking it away. Many stubs have just one line in it, so I think it is unjustified that it should be deleted.

Warm Regards,

LB22 (talk to me!)Email me! 18:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Keep in mind that when it was tagged, there was nothing more than an infobox. A stub can be only a few sentences, but must provide useful information on the subject - it didn't. Either way, the article will be assessed by an administrator before being deleted, so if it now meets the criteria for inclusion, it will be fine! Happy editing, Ale_Jrbtalk 19:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

did u read it ?

About this : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:70.108.92.126&diff=cur .
It isnt vandalism. Did u read what I wrote or is this just another bot? 70.108.92.126 (talk) 19:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Removing warnings from another user's talk page for no reason, especially when that account is currently engaging in vandalism, is not allowed. Ale_Jrbtalk 19:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

That poster didnt vandalise. S\he added info that the bot erroneously deleted. Then momu & cfred jumped in incorrectly as well. Look @ the edits. 70.108.92.126 (talk) 19:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

That user has been blocked by an administrator for edit warring and adding significant amounts of content that are not backed up by a reliable source. Removing the messages on this talk page may have prevented action form being taken; this is why it is not allowed when suspicious activities are in progress. Ale_Jrbtalk 19:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

for VandalProof--Finalnight (talk) 17:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

non vandalism

Insert non-formatted text here

can i just say how is it vandalism when it is all actual fact. I shud know seeing as it is my place of residence and i have used this lynn b4 sooo wat is the problem

RE: Honorific

Okay I understand, although it would have been nice to be there. Anyway, I am currently making a few redirects to du'a! :D (spelling variations suck =P —Preceding unsigned comment added by TrainTC (talkcontribs) 19:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Redirects

Thank you very much :D. Very much appreciated —Preceding unsigned comment added by TrainTC (talkcontribs) 19:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I can't tell you how many times I've been beaten by you in reverting vandalism. It's getting downright distressing. Excuse me for a minute........*SNIFFF*.....ok, I'm good now. ;) Keep up the great work! Thingg 19:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


I wasn't sure how you wanted this formatted on you awards page, so I'll just put it here. Thingg 19:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! :D Ale_Jrbtalk 19:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election

An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 12:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

VandalProof stuff

See User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Discuss#Nothing happens.. . Oh, and you haven't updated User:AmiDaniel/VP1.4/DevLog since you created it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calvin 1998 (talkcontribs)

I'll look into it. Ale_Jrbtalk 13:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks re: Ireland

What drew my attention was "Chara curta in Ireland" being entered as a reference/note - it was given a reference no 77 when infact it was an "http". I deleted the ref /ref and all seemed well, the website opened up!Osborne (talk) 21:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Glad you sorted out the problem! :D Ale_Jrbtalk 21:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

You're Invited to join the WikiProject Artemis Fowl!

You have been invited to join WikiProject Artemis Fowl, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Artemis Fowl-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in Artemis Fowl and/or your many edits to Artemis Fowl articles. If you would like to join, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of active project members.

Thank you.

Calvin 1998 Talk Contribs 06:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Artemis Fowl (novel) GA status

Did you renominate it for GA status? I'm too lazy to check, and it seems you've been working on it a lot. Calvin 1998 (t|c) 03:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Not yet - it would be nice if it passed this time, and I'm not sure it's quite ready. Ale_Jrbtalk 09:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
It is now :P. Ale_Jrbtalk 21:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

VandalProof Emergency

I've also notified AmiDaniel, it's about that thing I told you about above, at User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Discuss#Nothing happens... It's getting worse, another user just reported the same problem. You might want to take a closer look. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 00:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

VP

Hi, i just posted my request for permission to use vandelproof.

I dont meet a requirement (the posts one) but i have been fighting the anti vandel battle extemly hard over the past few days and ive been a user for quite awhile. Im hoping you will grant me this tool so i can fight even harder :) --Prom3th3an (talk) 13:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank-you

I can has mop?
Hi Ale jrb! Thank-you for your support in my RfA (91/1/1).
I take all the comments to heart and hope I can fulfil the role of being
an admin to the high standard that the community deserves.
Seraphim♥ Whipp 16:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

mean

You're a mean person. Stop Me Now! (talk) 19:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I disagree. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 20:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalproof login

I've tried logging in numerous times but it just stays on the login page. Do I have to restart my computer or something first? George D. Watson (Dendodge).TalkHelp 22:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

No, there's a problem with VP. See User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Discuss#Nothing happens..

Thanks

for the VandalProof approval. P|^|C (talk) 06:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 11 13 March 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Accusations of financial impropriety receive more coverage Best of WikiWorld: "Five-second rule" 
News and notes: New bureaucrat, Wikimania bids narrowed, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Vintage image restoration WikiProject Report: Professional wrestling 
Tutorial: Summary of policies Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 12 17 March 2008 About the Signpost

Best of WikiWorld: "The Rutles" News and notes: Single-user login, election commission, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Changes at peer review 
WikiProject Report: Tropical cyclones Tutorial: Editing Monobook, installing scripts 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Artemis Fowl (novel)

The article Artemis Fowl (novel) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Artemis Fowl (novel) for things needed to be addressed. Million_Moments (talk) 14:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 13 24 March 2008 About the Signpost

Single User Login enabled for administrators Best of WikiWorld: "Clabbers" 
News and notes: $3,000,000 grant, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Banner shells tame talk page clutter WikiProject Report: Video games 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

For bringing Artemis Fowl (novel) to GA-class, I award you this WPAF Barnstar

The WikiProject Artemis Fowl Barnstar
For bringing Artemis Fowl (novel) to GA-class. Good work! Calvin 1998 (t-c)

Calvin 1998 (t-c) 05:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Cheers :). Ale_Jrbtalk 15:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)