Talk:Alexis Drazen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject 24
24 Portal

This page is part of 24 WikiProject, an attempt to expand and create articles that relate to 24. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class.

Contents

[edit] Merger

Andre and Alexis, orchestrated everything that happened during Day 1: the attempts on Palmer, kidnapping Jack's family, raiding the secret DOD prison to rescue their father. Definately not minor characters. --T smitts 17:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Only involved in the plot in season 1 not going to ever return not mentioned in any way since season one, and no major notability asserted. Merge--Lucy-marie 17:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. We can't just give every villain, however minor, their own page. Merge. asyndeton 17:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Alexis is a major character. He was a member of the Drazen clan and just because he appears in one season, doesn't mean that he isn't important.Lan Di (talk) 21:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

It also doesn't mean he warrants his own page--Lucy-marie (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

It also doesn't mean the inverse. If he is a major character in a season, that warrants one's own page.--Lan Di (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I think you are using the word 'major' a bit too loosely. I can think of plenty of characters who have as many appearances as Alexis, but, like him, they are not major and they don't deserve their own page. asyndeton talk 22:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Merge, merge, merge. There are literally over hundred characters on 24. So even "major" can be meaningless. The article obviously doesn't have any sources to assert its notability. миражinred سَراب ٭ (speak, my child...) 23:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Alexisdrazen.jpg

Image:Alexisdrazen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 14:22, 26 October 2007 (UTC)