Talk:Alexei Cherepanov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ice Hockey, an attempt at building a useful ice hockey resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information). Edit this message Ice hockey Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] Career start

Shouldn't Cherepanov's pro career start be listed as 2006, when he began playing for Avangard Omsk or should it be whenever he begins his NHL career? David7581 18:16, 24 June, 2007 (UTC)

I've checked a few other Russian player articles and they do have pro start dated as rookie RSL. IrisKawling 22:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Career start should always be first pro season, for example first season in the SEL, RSL, or the NHL (mostly for North American players). --Krm500 22:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Promise to Omsk

Should it be mentioned that Cherepanov has said that he would play the next season for Avangard Omsk? ^[1] --David7581 21:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

He does have a 2 years on his contract with Omsk remaining. At the draft he said he would only play 1 more year, and give 2 weeks notice and play in the nhl for 08-09. However recently translations of an interview with russianprospects.com came out in which he said he intends on honoring the 2 year contract. Conflicting reports might not be best for the article.. IrisKawling 01:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

How about mentioning that he has a 2-year contract, but whether he'll play the 2nd year is disputed? That might work alright. --David7581 02:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)