Talk:Alexander Wendt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.
Photo request It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.
Maintenance An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.



[edit] Alexander Wendt sure did a good job writing about himself

Though, now that I think of it, this is against wikipedia policy. I decided to look because the article about this obscure intellectual just goes on and on and doesn't even cite anything.

164.107.190.144 is the creator of this article, which links to none other than Ohio State University, which coincidentally is where Wendt teaches.

Requesting deletion... we dont need articles about arrogant morons who think quantum mechanics has practical implications to sociology.

I think you're confused. 164.107.190.144 is the IP of the first person to edit the talk page for this article. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Wendt&oldid=35816643 to see what they said there. The article itself was created by 24.71.223.141, which is a Shaw Cable broadband user. I can't find any reference to an Ohio State IP address editing the article text at all.
Nevertheless, you have a point that most of the text in this article goes into a lot more detail than is really appropriate for an encyclopedia, and should be drastically trimmed. I'll take a stab at that. Thanks for pointing that out, though I really rather wish you'd just said so in the first place. :-) Tim Pierce 05:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] where is the rest of the article

that article was obviously written as part of a student paper on the book —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.126.139.211 (talk) 22:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)