Talk:Alexander Chavchavadze/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Alexander Chavchavadze - rated as A, very clear, encyclopaedic, great use of reliable sources and references, very accurate based on historical documents, primary and secondary sources. Ldingley 17:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- I rated it B -- see if you can expand the lead per WP:LEAD. After that, I'd submit it to our Peer review process for a more extensive review so that you can go for GA or A... --plange 23:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- I believe that this is an A + work. However, Kober, you might want to check out what's wrong with that WP:LEAD. Sosomk 16:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- I give it an A. Excellent work on this article, guys. -- Clevelander 20:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Put it back to B -- not meant as a disparagement -you guys have worked very hard and it shows!! Keep up the good work. Assigning A class is a big deal-- and you shouldn't assign them to your own work, but if you think it is A class (and therefore skipping GA nomination), then I recommend requesting a Peer review so that you can get some constructive feedback (and hopefully an A!) --plange 04:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not going to fight you guys on this, but this is a template for WPBiography and used by WPBiography members to rate how we think it rates according to our criteria, not for non-members to take votes on and rate themselves. It might very well be an A (which means it is a possible FA), but can you please submit it for a Peer review by our project members so that Biography members can assess it? Thanks :-) --plange 22:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
