Talk:Alekhine's Defence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Alekhine Defence or Alekhine's Defence?
Alekhine Defence or Alekhine's Defence? Is one name more correct than the other? --Sonjaaa 20:04, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)
ECO says Alekhine's, but both are generally accepted. --Fermatprime 20:23, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Lasker attack
Does anyone know which one of the two Laskers invented the Lasker Alekhine Attack? The name should be linked, just to which one? Viruswitch 23:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- I've always known and read about it as the "Two pawn attack". If anybody gave Emanuel Lasker credit for it, it's probably for just one game, same as in the Lasker-Pelikan variation (now Sveshnikov variation) of the Sicilian. AFAIK, no opening name credits Edward Lasker. --Wfaxon 15:44, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- This is probably the stem game (for the name, anyway): Em. Lasker v. Buchholtz, simultaneous exhibition, Copenhagen 1927, billed as an "Alekhine Defense: Hunt Variation. Lasker Simul Gambit" by www.chessgames.com. That reminded me that I've also seen "Hunt variation" used for 4.c5, and I think that might even be more popular than "Two pawn attack". (At least Google(tm) agrees...) I'm pretty sure the Lasker name would be associated only with the subvariation. --Wfaxon 17:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- 4.c5 is also known as the "Chase variation". A lot of names for probably the worst of White's major lines. --Wfaxon 18:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-