User talk:Alden Jones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am sorry for my long break in editing wikipedia, because I didn't have the time, because I've long learnt (I am 1st year student of computing), and I hope that now will be better. I'm backing to edit EN-WIKI. Ps. thanks for..Piotrus and Visor. Alden or talk with Alden 20:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

1 Editwar
2 Personal attacks
- 2.1 Harassment
3 Reply
4 e-mail address
5 Re: Official propose
6 I agree
7 Windows Vista Embedded
8 Your entry on WP:FACE
9 Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz‎
10 Edit summary
11 Would you care to explain...
12 Your recent message

[edit] Editwar

Poprawiłem błąd techniczny związany z userboxem (za co podziękowałeś mi na privie), a później Kuminal to zrevertował. Visor (talk) 11:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Moim zdaniem jednak ten userbox był dobrze zrobiony (wiem co mówię, jestem po informatyce), więc nie wiem czemu Visor rewertuje coś na czym się najwyraźniej nie zna. Kuminal (talk) 12:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Nie trzeba być po informatyce żeby stwierdzić, że w tej wersji coś jest nie tak z userboxem inkluzjonisty ;) Visor (talk) 17:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Renata (talk) 13:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

If you don't calm down, I will have no other choice but to block you for a day or two for 3 revert rule violation and personal attacks. Commenting on specific users, their education or intelligence level is completely unacceptable. Please take a break to clear out your mind. This is your last warning. Renata (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Harassment

Please review Wikipedia:Harassment, specifically user space harassment. Continuing to restore this material to the user's talk page is problematic with regards to that behavioral guideline. Note that continuing such behavior will lead to blocks for disruption. (Also, please be advised that there is an open conversation about this matter at the administrator's noticeboard/incidents.) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I have to agree with users above. Restoring your message repeatedly is not good. I suggest you concentrate on writing content instead of trying to discuss things with editors like M.K.

Musze sie zgodzic z tymi komentarzami powyzej. Zostawiles mu wiadomosc raz, odtwarzanie jej jest w tak samo zlym stylu jak jego usuwanie - a nawet gorszym. Skoncentruj sie na pisaniu artykulow, nie ma co dyskutowac z M.K.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:18, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

Hello. You were blocked for attempting to harass another user, just as the blocking notice indicates. You were warned that continuing to restore material to user's talk pages was against the guideline and that persistence would lead to a block for disruption. So it did. Please stop. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't believe User:M.K is an administrator. However, even if he is, it might be considered prudent of him to leave it for somebody else to address. I have no idea what your history with M.K. might be or the source of your conflict. Anyway, I have his page watchlisted for now to be sure that the disruption doesn't continue. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] e-mail address

Hey! My e-mail (and also MSN) address is xander.harris69@hotmail.com Who are you xD Wax69 (talk) 20:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Official propose

Thank you but no. I already have to much work :) / Dzięki, ale nie. Już teraz mam za dużo roboty :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I agree

The AK article should be closed for a moment to let the discussion evolve.--Molobo (talk) 09:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Windows Vista Embedded

Hello Warren, Windows Vista Embedded article hasn't sources, so I please you about help with this article, because, it isn't believable article, if hasn't sources. Alden or talk with Alden 07:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, Alden, sorry it took me a while to get back to you on this... it looks like some progress has been made in figuring out what is going on with Vista Embedded. I was a bit skeptical myself but Microsoft has recently made some announcements about it and User:Soumyasch and I have talked about how to move forward. Have a look at our talk pages for that conversation, and some links to potentially useful sources. Any further help you can render with getting things organised would be great. :-) -/- Warren 00:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your entry on WP:FACE

Hi Alden. I'm sending this message to every user who has an entry on Wikipedia's Facebook but whose picture is currently not visible for some reason. As I explained on Wikipedia talk:Facebook#Removal of empty spaces, I will remove these entries within a week unless a user inserts a picture into it. However, you have stated on this page that you are currently away, and that you will be back in May. As I do not consider it very nice to remove a user from the facebook without him/her being aware of it, I will not remove your name yet. Cheers, Face 13:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC) PS: My name is a coincidence.

Ok then, in simple English: go to this page: Wikipedia:Facebook. As you can see, you are on that page, but you do not have an image. If you want to stay on the facebook, you should have some sort of image. Do you want to stay on that page, or should I remove you? Cheers, Face 22:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz‎

Why are you deleting reliably sourced text. do you realize that this is an article about a book, and you are deleting quotes from that book? Boodlesthecat ^Meow? 21:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

It's a quote from the book, which a reliable source describes as the author's summary of the book. The fact that yuo don't like what the author says is zero gruonds for censoring it. Boodlesthecat ^Meow? 21:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Discuss it on the article talk page. Boodlesthecat ^Meow? 21:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summary

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Gamaliel (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Would you care to explain...

...what this revert was? Did you actually look at what you were reverting? --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 13:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I reverted it, because version by Tymek was better than other version behind version Piotrus, and Molobo. By the way - I can't said why did I revert --- this my business, so please don't more ask about it me, because I won't answer on your questions about my reverts. Please you should learn Polish history - maybe then you're going to understand it, because I think that you can't understand and you're unhelpful editor. Alden or talk with Alden 14:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

In other words, you didn't actually look at the edit; you were just edit warring. I didn't remove, add, or change any content other than a duplicated piece of text that was seriously breaking the formatting -- in particular the references. Blind reverts of that sort are the worst sort of edit warring. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 14:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

On Wikipedia, we encourage users to discuss their edits by using talk pages. I notice that on two contentious articles you have recently reverted editors while not using the talk page. And when a respected, long-standing user asks you to explain your revert, you have rudely replied to him and refused to discuss the matter. This is not "your business", as you put it, this is the business of Wikipedia, and here on Wikipedia we collaborate and discuss this business with other editors. In the future, when you involve yourself in edit wars, please use the talk page to discuss controversial reverts. Gamaliel (talk) 17:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent message

I have removed your personal attack from my talk page. I note that Wikipedia is not racist and it allows people of any race or ethnicity to edit any article. I also note the policy Wikipedia:No personal attacks. If you persist in your personal attacks against myself or any other editor, you are subject to blocking for disruption. Gamaliel (talk) 19:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

This is your final warning. Restore your attack again or attack any other editor and you will be blocked. Gamaliel (talk) 20:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Gamaliel (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I am endorsing Gamaliel's warning. Tylko trolle nazywają innych trollami, zachowuj się albo dostaniesz bloka.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)