Talk:Albrecht Prinz von Croy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group.

	Germany Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

This article was nominated for deletion on July 19, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep, as no consensus.

Original version stored below for historical reference:

Please don't delete this talk page again. If there is content you don't like, edit the page and explain your reasoning. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:27, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

The only reason this is here is so the anonymous author can avoid its deletion at the German Wikipedia. I see no good-faith reason for it to be here. Additionally, it has no authorship information, making it a copyvio under the GFDL. -- Cyrius|✎ 17:48, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

This is ridiculous. The article was originally written by me. Copyright templates are not required for articles, Mr. Cyrius. The reason the article is stored at the talk page is that it is the original the English version was based upon. Also, the German Wikipedia voted to keep it, so when things are cleaned up there (i.e. abusive sysops desysopped), responsible Germans may be grateful that someone cares to write articles for them and may want to recreate it. 83.109.179.232 11:55, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Reality-check for the "information" given above (that German Wikipedia voted to keep it - ???) see
vfd in de:WP
Call for undeletion on de:WP
The IP's strong efforts to keep the article in en:WP are to respect for sure - but it has nothing to do with the vfd-procedure in the German WP, which the IP obviously didn't understand. So: If the ridiculous talk against the deleting of this stub in German WP has to stay on this talk page, please don't delete the answer again like you did several times before (see history of this talk page), for you got nothing to hide - ;)
--Rax 19:42, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

When the article was deleted at de: there were 4 keep votes (including "Überarbeiten") and one delete vote (nominator). 83.109.159.205 08:49, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

You should be careful about talking of other's deletion of answers, considering your behaviour in regard to German talk pages. 83.109.159.205 08:51, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

To your first meaning: To be able to read gives great advantages.
To your second one: Have a nice day, too. --Rax 14:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)