Talk:Al Costello

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Al Costello article.

Article policies
WikiProject Professional wrestling Al Costello is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Flag
Portal
Al Costello is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Good article Al Costello has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
November 4, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

|||||action1oldid=169179489 ||

[edit] GA review

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. Check back in a day for a more detailed review, but as of right now I don't see much wrong with the article, it looks fine, and passes the quick-fail criteria. The final result and review are to be coming soon. FamicomJL 03:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA pass

1. MoS and prose PASS The prose is fine, it all looks good. I found only two minor errors, and fixed them both. No use in putting an article on hold over such small details.

2. Factual accuracy and verifiability PASS Only minor issue I have is the low amount of sources for the early life section, but since that's goin to be the hardest thing to find sources for, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt there.

3. Broadness of coverage PASS Very well done. The sections on the history of the team, involving Costello, is very well done. I am not a good wrestling history buff of the 60's and 70's, and this article did a fantastic job in having me learn so much about the team.

4. Neutrality PASS Definite pass. No netruality issues here.

5. Stability PASS No edit wars recently, no vandals recently, very stable article.

6. Images PASS The image has its proper fair-use rationale. My only nitpick is with it being the only image. I'd love to see some shots of the team in action.

7. Congratulations on the passing of the article! Good work to all involved, it looks really good! If anyone has any questions, feel free to ask them either on here, or my talkpage. FamicomJL 16:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)