Talk:Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Biography     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. WikiProject Islam / Shi'a Islam      (Rated Start-Class) Islam Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Islam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Shi'a Islam task force. (with unknown importance) Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Middle Ages (Rated Start-Class) Middle Ages Portal Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. Crusades task force WikiProject Middle Ages To do:

Contents 1 Biography assessment rating comment 2 Incomplete - What about the madness??? 3 Another Perspective 4 translation of name 5 Editing 6 Huge NPOV Issues; No sources/original research

[edit] Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.--KGV (Talk) 06:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

At some time, he went mad and tyranized his people, forcing them to live by night and other illogical practices. Try to write that neutrally. --Error 00:21, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Of course, the opinions of the Druze should be voiced also, but dont leave out information, just present both sides. Does anyone know what da'wa refers to, specifically, in entry?

[edit] Incomplete - What about the madness???

Something should be said about the theory that he suffered from madness near the end of his life. One could also mention the beliefs of the Druze people.

I have never heard of the theory that he suffered from madness. In fact, the article is biased and does not give the perspective of the Druze.

[edit] Another Perspective

Many believe that Hakim was not actually mad, but that everything he did served a specific purpose. The fact that the article percieves him as mad shows a lot of bias. Many believe that his actions were to turn people back to God and away from other objects of worship. More should be looked into this matter. Also anything said about the beliefs of the Druze should not be taken literally since the religion is so secretive. The Druze did not worship Hakim, they worshipped God. Furthermore, when Hakim disappeared he did not reappear in Lebanon as the article claims. There is very little evidence concerning Al-Hakim and the sources that this page uses are also full of speculation. I have not really found any consistent information concerning Al-Hakim.

[edit] translation of name

"hakim" does not mean 'ruler'. although the word has been used as a title of position, it is best translated as 'wise' or 'judge'.

read some manuscripts of dai syedna ahmed hamidudin kiramani,he has given all explanations about the righteousnous of hakim, the lineage,the claim of the druze,and his acts,... this article is pretty bias ,

"Ḥakīm is also known for his persecution of Christians and Jews and other typical Muslim behavior."

Now if that's not biased, I don't know what is.

---

There's an article on Hakim (title)... AnonMoos 23:45, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Editing

I added some information about Al-Hakim eccentric behavior, his death and a picture of his mosque. There no need for his religious section because it doesn’t contribute anything to the subject. Al-Hakim was an unstable man and he prosecuted Muslims as well as other religions. --ThutmoseIII 17:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Huge NPOV Issues; No sources/original research

Not only is calling his behavior "eccentric" without citation completely biased and full of POV, this name-calling that ThutmoseIII insists on without any scholarly research or evidence seems entirely offensive. Use documentation, please. Otherwise name-calling an historical figure just becomes the garbage that hard-working Wikipedians must work to overcome. His influence on the Druze as well as their reverence and worship of him is also completely and critically relevant to what needs to be included in his page. To not mention it I think would be reprehensible. -- 23 June 2007 129.170.168.43

Whatever -- he's widely known as the "Mad Caliph", and his destruction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem played a very important role in preparing the way for the Crusades. He's been a controversial figure for centuries, and the "name-calling" started long long ago... AnonMoos 23:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

I think certain users should have some self-respect and respect other people's beliefs. Also cite sources that the public can access. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DRC27 (talk • contribs) 04:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Whatever -- your Ismaili and/or Druze and/or other religious beliefs may lead you to revere him as a flawless figure without significant sin, but the consensus of historical scholarship in the field is that it's reasonably clear that his decrees and actions resulted in many negative effects on many individuals, and therefore it's pointless for you to expect that Wikipedia will defer to the hagiography of your religious tradition (whatever that might be) in opposition to established historical facts. If Hakim had shown more respect for my religion (instead of ordering the destruction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in 1009 A.D), then it would now be easier for historical scholars to discuss the facts in a way that would respect your religion (whatever that might be).

However, I'll go to the University library sometime in the next few days (hopefully a week from now at most) and look up what the Encyclopaedia of Islam says on the subject, and will incorporate the factual substance of whatever I find to be relevant there into this article in an impeccably-sourced manner... AnonMoos (talk) 07:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

P.S. The "Journal of Near Eastern Studies" is available in many large University libraries, and in on-line form to students and staff at many participating academic institutions through JSTOR, so it's hardly "inaccessible" in any very meaningful sense. There's no requirement whatever that sources of Wikipedia articles must be available publicly on-line... AnonMoos (talk) 07:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You have no right to claim that my suggestions for improving the quality of this article is influenced by what you perceive to be my religious tradition; that is very insulting. Furthermore you seem biased in your posts as shown by: "if Hakim had shown more respect for my religion (instead of ordering the destruction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in 1009 A.D)…" Someone in such a biased position as you is not even remotely qualified to claim authority over a subject such as this. I am in contact with professors who are experts in the fields of Near Eastern, Middle Eastern, and Islamic studies. My grandfather for example, being one of those aforementioned professors, received his PhD in Islamic/Near Eastern studies from the University of Michigan with a specialization in Ismaili thought (and since you are so quick to accuse others of biases, which I suspect is a projection of your own flaws, I want to make it clear that neither he nor I are Muslims). I do not need to qualify myself to someone such as yourself seeing as I am more of an authority on the subject anyways. And since u seem to be so interested in this subject, I have been told that a lot of information concerning Al-Hakim has been found in the Genizah documents. The information present there has contradicted a lot of the so called “facts” about Al-Hakim that you mentioned. Since history is not all fact, and contains a lot of speculation and conjecture, I suggest you choose what to believe carefully and avoid forming hasty biased opinions based on shady testimonia. The journal of near eastern studies as well as the encyclopedia of islam, even though reputable in their own right, rely on whatever information is available. With hardly any information available on certain subjects it is not wise to blindly accept certain questionable information, even though it may suit your own personal and sometimes biased purposes. I’m planning an edit of this article to make it more scholarly and less biased. I’m sure you wont mind. --DRC27 (talk) 01:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

DRC27, Virtually any reputable source on middle eastern history will talk of Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah's ecentric behavior. Do not delete source material that follows wikipedia policies or you will be blocked. --BoogaLouie (talk) 19:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

BoogaLouie, i do not deny al-hakim's eccentric behavior so do not put words in my mouth again. however, part of being an academic is the ability to sort through primary sources. i suggest you read primary sources. finally i do not take kindly to being threatened. if you cant respectfully have a conversation then you should keep your mouth shut and mind your own business. --DRC27 (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)