User talk:Akira-otomo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Soz

I still think the same but i will keep my view to myself in future iam sorry plus please dont leave things like that in my talk box not A very fair thing to do to other usersOnlinegamer1 (talk) 21:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] HTML/Examples of Coding

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article HTML/Examples of Coding, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of HTML/Examples of Coding. WebHamster 11:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:User Pages

A tag has been placed on Category:User Pages, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RossPatterson (talk) 19:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:Archived Pages

A tag has been placed on Category:Archived Pages, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RossPatterson (talk) 19:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Contributions

A few of your contributions lately have caught my attention. First, you created two mirrors of templates that I have that were unnecessary, and your comments to Onlinegamer1 were highly improper. I suggest you spend more time writing articles and less time trying to make Wikipedia like MySpace.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I have been editing my User Page recently, but this is becuause OnlineGamer1 has been complaning that putting Wikipe-tan on my User is classed as Hentai. Please unblock me as I had just finished the changes regarding the above, and was about to edit the main frame of Wikipedia. I hope that these reasons will make you think again about reinstating my Account, thank you!"

Decline reason: "Please rewrite your unblock request, this is not coherent. Please also ensure that you address the reason for your block. — Yamla (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I've been editing my User Page Lately becuse I had a run in with User:Onlinegamer1 - he said that Wikipe-tan was hentai and that I should have taken it off my page, so I have. I believe this was the reason I was blocked, because I was not editing the main frame Wikipedia. Also, I think I was treating Wikipedia like My Space, rather than a Encyclopedia, I will stop this habit if you unblock me. Thanks, Akira-otomo May I also add that I edit from my Uncle's house, School and Home. On some occasions, I also edit from friends' houses."

Decline reason: "Having looked into your edits (both on deleted pages and pages that still exist), I see a lot of edits that can only be descibed as using Wikipedia as a social networking site or free web space. That's not what Wikipedia is for, and that kind of activity is inappropriate. Besides that stuff, I've noticed you having a difficult time interacting appropriately with other editors. You have also made some article edits that look well-intentioned but in the end not great ideas. I for one feel that while Zscout's assessment that you are not yet ready for Wikipedia is probably correct. However, since you now say you want to edit Wikipedia properly, I feel it's appropriate to at least give you a chance to explain what kind of contribution you want to make to the project. I'll watchlist the page so I'll see your response. Mangojuicetalk 18:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Hi there, your block reason is honestly, I feel with everything that you do, I don't think you are ready for Wikipedia just quite yet. We are here to make an encyclopedia, not a gaia clone I will let an admin decide, but just to let you know of your block reason... --The Helpful One 18:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Ways in which I will edit Wikipedia are: A) Edit articles Music Related, as this seems to be my strong point, rock/emo/punk music. 2) Any Sience Topics I may know anything about. 3) Anime/Manga, Japan related articles as these are other strong points. 4) I will try to expand any stubs I come across that I know about. I would mainly want to edit Wikipedia as an editor, rather than being classed as a Vandal. Please, give me another change to redeem myself. Thanks - Akira-otomo"

Decline reason: "Per below. Given the time that's passed since this request came up, no other admin is apparently willing to give you a second chance based on the above, and neither am I. I will make the block into a 1 year block, though, so you can come back to editing later when it may be more appropriate. Mangojuicetalk 03:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Let's get this out of the way: You Aren't A Vandal. There, an admin said it, it must be true. :) As for the request, though, A and 3 are tasks we've already got more people than we need, where people have to constantly clean up after inexperienced contributors, and 2 and 4 are too general to be appealing. Also, your spelling and grammar is not up to the level we need. I think if we did unblock you there would have to be someone watching all your edits to correct mistakes that you make, which makes your contributing not that helpful. If you're serious about this, take a look at WP:ADOPT - would you be willing to come back as the adoptee of someone, if anyone will volunteer? I'm going to leave the unblock request unanswered, so we can get another admin's opinion here. Mangojuicetalk 19:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
THanks, Mango Juice, but adopting isn't the one for me as I want to be in the action. I'm sorry about the grammar, but that's because I can't type that well. I'll learn how to type properly if it helps me get back into Wikiupedia - please!!