Talk:AK-103

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

What's this about the burst mode? Are you saying that the AK-103 design has the capability for future implementation of a 2 round burst mode, or that the AK-103 can fire in 2 round burst mode in its present form. The AK-103 has three modes like all Kalashnikov's; Safe, Semi, and Auto. --Skyler Streng 08:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Never mind, my bad. I was thinking of the AN-94
umm just an fyi, settings are Safe, Auto, and Semi; order sequence, M16 is Safe, semi, and Burst(older models Auto)

Does that mean the other part of the "Design Differences" you added is invalid as well?

No, that part is still correct, AFAIKCynicalMe 19:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Venezuela

I see its listed they received 30,000 of their 100,000 AK-103 order. However news reports are stating they still plan to buy 100,000 of them and this recent trip in July 2006 was to seal the deal and buy jets as well. Is this a seperate deal or continuation of the listed one? [1] --zero faults |sockpuppets| 20:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stub?

I don't see this article as deserving a stub rating, I think the stub flag should be removed. Youssef51 11:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Effective range

Effective range 500m vs. 1000m on russian page... 500 or 1000? 85.25.138.222 (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Boris Yershov

[edit] Image

Who in the hell replace normal image of an AK-103 with picture of some obscure US-made civilian version? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.170.91.227 (talk) 05:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)