User talk:Airman Wolf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] wikiproject paintball

hey i noticed you joined the project so i wanted to give you an official welcome. i'm gonna keep this as brief and to the point as possible, as apposed to rambaling on and on. so welcome, i'm giving you a news board to keep track of project news, most keep it at the top of their page, you can do what you wish with it, heck delete if you feel like it. if you want to join the rateing commitee that should be up soon (i hope) just say so on the project talk page. again welcome and good luck, if you have any problems, just talk to me on my talk page, unfortunatly i do't hae much of a life, so i'll get back to you real quick.

peace out-Threewaysround 23:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Paintball
Category: Paintball
Announcements
watch · edit · discuss
WikiProject Paintball News edit
  • The term "paintball gun" is no longer to be used in any article: please change this wherever you see it! We must use the term paintball marker at all times from here on out. Keep up the good work. RavenStorm, Lead Coordinator
  • It has been strongly suggested by fellow member Three ways round that we add references and sources to our articles and make this our priority for now, as expansion and addition of articles has been slow of late. Go find an unsourced article and get some good references! Together we can make the WikiProject Paintball more authentic and encyclopedic. RavenStorm, Lead Coordinator


Category News edit
  • The player positions pages have been renamed according to game type to be more accurate.
  • Two more subcategories have been created: Woodsball, and Speedball. If any new pages are created that are related to these, please use their respective category tags instead of [[Category:Paintball]]. Thanks!


Priority Tasks edit
To continue the project's drive toward FA status for the Paintball article, please review the project news and spend some time going over the article.
Sources: Articles such as Glossary of paintball terms have been tagged for not citing sources. Be sure to check around for more of these articles, and see if we can find some resources that can validate our information.
Current priority: The Paintball variations article needs to be synchronized with all other articles that mention variants of paintball games or paintball game types. Remember, to be consistent, that 'variants' are variants such as CTF, while 'game types' are woodsball, speedball, et cetera.


[edit] Kingman Group

Hey i checked out your kingman group page and it's looking pretty good. I was expecting a small stub, but was very pleasently suprised with how far along it's gotten. Good Work!:D

For ways to improve it. I only had three area's to improve that jumped out at me.

the first was the different markers/equipment. Everything there is very good, especially near the beginning, but as you get on into the spyder products there isn't much info on them. Just a short paragraph, instead of a few sentances, check out the Tippmann page for a basic outline for the marker overview. (but hopefully when it's done it will look better than the Tippmann page). Also i would check and see which markers have pages for themselves i think ravenstorm made a page for a couple of the spyders, and then the paragraph is a bit easier just follow that basic format, and provide a main page link.

The second would be to provide a bit of information about the company itself, and not just it's products. It might be a bit hard but it improves the overall article quite a bit. Just some information; when it was created, who by, (those two i think are in the page but just in the intro), why was it created, what was their first product, what was there biggest success story, some stuff about their growth. Just that kinda stuff

The last is kinda broad but just some more refrences and inline citations. i don't know of one article in category paintball that has enough refrences, but it's important enough to warrent mentioning.

It may seem like quite a bit of work, and it probibly is, but not as much as you would think. And i'm not trying to be overly-critical, like i already said it's looking really good so far, these are just the things it needs to be bumped up to Good, and Featured article quality. anyway anytime you need any help or anything just shout out on my talk page like you did, and keep up the good Work ! :D

peace out _Threewaysround 20:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)