Talk:Air Canada Flight 190

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Notability

Normally incidents of this type are probably not notable enough to have an article. However, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada is investigating, and it did make the prime position on the cover of today's Globe and Mail. Let's see what comes out over the next few days. -- Flyguy649 talk 23:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Merger

The two should obviously be merged – they discuss the same incident. Also the other article has the flight number wrong. -- Flyguy649 talk 16:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Article should merge

I agree, they both talk about the same thing. I think the Air Canada Flight 190 incident article should be merged with this. 99.237.64.152 (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Against Deletion

Merging is good, but I object against deletion.116.48.109.4 (talk) 13:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] missing redirects

This article is missing some redirects:

132.205.44.5 (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I added the redirects. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 18:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

This should not be deleted... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Messiisking (talkcontribs) 17:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)