User talk:Agony

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome

Hello Agony-fi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 17:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Building consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

[edit] Advertising

Hi. Sorry for the delay in replying to your question. The fact is that it's very difficult, sometimes, to know where to draw the line between an advertisement and an article. Even the Wikipedia:Spam page doesn't give much guidance to those writing articles. So I looked back at your article and it was set out correctly (although with lots of errors in the English) but it concentrated very heavily on the successes of this company. It didn't say much about the history of the company. Since it is actually a marketing/advertising firm, the danger of the article appearing to be written for the purpose of soliciting contracts is that much greater than for other kinds of company. If I were to restore the article, would you be prepared to spend a lot of time addressing these issues? Deb 18:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

About common history I cannot write much more what article already had, but I found page that contain every published stock exchange announcement since 1996. Perhaps from there I can find notable history. I understand the danger, but I always try to achieve neutral point of view. If you return the article, I'm ready to try write history about Evia. --Agony-fi 06:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

OK, done! Deb 11:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, now added brief history (with some downhills :) and requested spelling correction. --Agony-fi 12:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

"Sinut on estetty kahdeksi viikoksi toistuvan vandalismin takia. Jos tai kun esto päättyy, toivomme sinun tekevän hyödyllisiä muutoksia sotkemisen sijaan. Jos jatkat vandalismia, sinut estetään uudestaan" Miksi? Käsittääkseni kyseessä ei ole tällä kertaa muokkaussota. Onko suomenkielisellä Wikipedialla jonkinlainen lakisääteinen velvoite pitää yllä Keskustelua käyttäjistä? Tämä "sääntö" luo käsityksen että suomenkielisen Wikipedian pääasiallinen sisältö on Keskustelu Käyttäjistä :-D, ja kaikki muu mitä se pitää sisällään on häiriköitävissä, käytettävissä propagandaan tms. Lisäksi, nimimerkki "Silvonen" luulee Käyttäjän keskustelusivua artikkeliksi, mistä häntä voisi huomauttaa. Wikipedia ei ole "Vapaasti muokattava", kyseinen määrite tulisi poistaa kaikista yhteyksistä. 91.153.63.71 06:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)